[philman_36]

Leo’s writings are the basis of many of your arguments - true?
No, they aren't the basis. I looked at and read the original information of my own accord. I've gotten input from a wide variety of sources, not just Leo. I merely agree with some of his writings.
Good God, man, I publicly railed against the man for whining about the cover-up issue and was chastised thoroughly for doing so by a poster here. I also hinted at (not wanting to embarrass the man) the fact that others had come to realize that the holdings were relevant when he hadn't even come to that conclusion. His understanding came later than that of others.

You accept without questions the legal ramblings of a professional poker player with absolutely no legal experience.
No, you dotard, I read the necessary information and came to my own conclusions! Unlike you, I don't let others think for me.

And you are upset when others disagree with you.
You're really pathetic. Wipe the lies off of your homepage.

[Harlan1196]

So you are hopelessly wrong due to you own doing? Makes sense to me.

[philman_36]

Here ya go Harlan, look at the dates!

@105...Well let's just look at what Chief Justice Waite had to say... August 08, 2010
Chief Justice Waite's "words" came from the decision.

@US SUPREME COURT PRECEDENT STATES THAT OBAMA IS NOT ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT June 21, 2011
Leo's light finally dawned a full nine months later.

Others at FR had already come to that understanding as well even before me and I used their knowledge.

I guess I should have been more direct and forceful back then instead of waiting so long.