To: Mr Rogers
The citizenship of WKA was the point of the case, and that on which they heard arguments.
Exactly! Now close your own trap.
What was his citizenship based upon? Wasn't it by virtue of the 14th Amendment?
A natural born citizen doesn't need the 14th amendment to be a citizen?
252 posted on
02/24/2012 5:24:44 PM PST by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: philman_36
There is no trap. They argued it is all the same. They spent half the decision showing he met the requirement for an NBC, then they show that is the same requirement the 14th uses.
253 posted on
02/24/2012 5:37:20 PM PST by
Mr Rogers
("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson