Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesWayneCT

“They already modified the bill to remove the requirement for a specific type of ultrasound.”

Just so you know the bill said “imagining ultrasound” and had always left it open to what type (Doctors choice) needed to be done.


6 posted on 02/22/2012 7:41:18 PM PST by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: blueyon
This was part of Governor McDonald's statement on the bill. The change was to make it explicit:
For this reason, I have recommended to the General Assembly a series of amendments to this bill. I am requesting that the General Assembly amend this bill to explicitly state that no woman in Virginia will have to undergo a transvaginal ultrasound involuntarily. I am asking the General Assembly to state in this legislation that only a transabdominal, or external, ultrasound will be required to satisfy the requirements to determine gestational age. Should a doctor determine that another form of ultrasound may be necessary to provide the necessary images and information that will be an issue for the doctor and the patient. The government will have no role in that medical decision.

7 posted on 02/22/2012 7:46:26 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson