Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: savagesusie

My son in law has just been deployed. My daughter sees the women that are in his unit and says some of them look/act very much like bimbos. I was suprised because I thought that the majority of women who’d be attracted to the military would be tom boy types. On top of the fact that it’s wrong imo to put the weaker sex on the front lines,for one because it blurs the lines of what God intended for our roles to be, I also have the notion that were I an army wife I don’t think I’d care to have my husband thousands of miles away for a year or more, working that closely with the opposite sex. Am I weird for thinking that way?


26 posted on 02/22/2012 10:55:07 PM PST by kelly4c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: kelly4c

No. Your gut feelings are as they should be.

There is a nature of man and nature of woman. Men have adapted to roles as well as women—to create the most effective way to live together and have “flourishing” offspring. That design is under attack as all Natural Law Theory by Marxism—that wants to abolish all biological ties. This means redesign the natures of women and men.

To put women in combat teaches them the opposite of what their natures were designed for—the nurturing and care for human beings. This training removes their natural instincts—in a Marxist way—redesigns females to go against nature.

Same with putting males and females together in battle—to destroy man’s natural protectiveness of the weaker sex—woman. That natural desire to protect and care for—to give the woman the ability to nurture their offspring—is essential to normal, healthy development of children. They need the emotional love of a mother for years so they are able to trust and love.

Destroy the Natural Family—the Marxists main goal with destroying Christianity because that religion is the best for strong families and unity.

They remove mothers and fathers from babies and those children grow up to fill prisons and gangs and commit suicide, etc. That is the type of people Marxists want—useful idiots that are dependent because of lack of love they have no self-esteem—no desire for individualism and the abilty for long term healthy attachments—which only comes from a secure childhood with both a loving father and mother. All psychology shows the damage to children who have no loving mother in the home—or who has been removed in early development-—it is severe mental instability and they will grow up not to trust and be loyal. They become what they learn.

Women put into battle is reeducation camp—to learn to kill and destroy their concept of men as protectors. It is part of redesigning man by atheists. I was a Tom boy and never wanted to go to battle—although I played with guns, etc as a child. I wanted to have babies and a man who would be a great role model for my children—one who would cherish me staying home and caring for out offspring-—the way God designed.

Does that mean all women should want that-—no—but the idea that there is no difference between men and women is a lie—and Natural Laws are supposed to be the basis of all our Just Laws-—there is no egalitarianism in the Constitution—that is Stalin’s ideology. That idea to disregard Nature is anathema to the Founders and the intent of our Judicial system.


60 posted on 02/23/2012 10:27:44 AM PST by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson