Ah, little Psycho - you can’t make an effective rebuttal, so you go straight for the jugular, bypassing common decency and comity. Please don’t respond to my comments again, unless you can use at least a modicum of civility. Thanks!
Churchill looked like a bulldog. Newt looks like the Keebler Elf, but he is a much smarter cookie than the elf. LOL
Churchill looked like a bulldog. Newt looks like the Keebler Elf, but he is a much smarter cookie than the elf. LOL
I simply mirrored your previous post with the same nonsensical rhetoric that you conveyed to the forum. True, It appears you are unable to understand initial decency and “comity”.
apparently, you are trying to impress the readers here of great literary prowess with the misuse of the word “comity”. I took the liberty of clarifying that misconception for you.
(In law, comity specifically refers to legal reciprocity—the principle that one jurisdiction will extend certain courtesies to other nations (or other jurisdictions within the same nation), particularly by recognizing the validity and effect of their executive, legislative, and judicial acts.
The term refers to the idea that courts should not act in a way that demeans the jurisdiction, laws, or judicial decisions of another jurisdiction.
Part of the presumption of comity is that other jurisdictions will reciprocate the courtesy shown to them. Many statutes relating to the enforcement of foreign judgments require that the judgments of a particular jurisdiction will be recognized and enforced by a forum only to the extent that the other jurisdiction would recognize and enforce the judgments rendered by that forum. See reciprocity (international relations).