Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GVnana
I'm not part of the 1%, but FUMR.

Several commentators have this right: when he tries to give a conservative answer, he really has to think about it. I believe it happens because his first thoughts are liberal.

9 posted on 02/24/2012 6:14:36 AM PST by kosciusko51 (Enough of "Who is John Galt?" Who is Patrick Henry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kosciusko51
It's funny how Romney can learn two decades worth of negative history about Newt and Santorum within a week, but it's been 5 years since his "conversion" and he still hasn't been able to "pick up" conservatism. The guy doesn't talk conservatism because he doesn't know or care about it. He's trying to pretend to be something he's not to win the power of the presidency, that's it.

And this talk about raising taxes on the rich shows that he is firmly in the Kerry/Buffett/Corzine camp of the wealthy economic liberal. Romney has also indicated before that he "can't" go out and talk about cutting taxes on the rich because he is rich, and he believes it would look bad. So he's blatantly doing the same thing liberals do, attacking the rich in order to try to get elected by everyone else. It's just somewhat shocking he can maintain establishment Republican support while doing this, although he did take a noticeable hit the day he talked about indexing the minimum wage to inflation. You could tell the establishment's enthusiasm decreased a bit that day, although it seemed to be on its way back up since then. Maybe this latest news will hurt it again.


39 posted on 02/24/2012 8:15:34 AM PST by JediJones (Watch "Gingrich to Michigan: Change or Die" on YouTube. Best Speech Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson