Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Another take.
1 posted on 02/24/2012 9:06:47 AM PST by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Resettozero

I believe his quest for the White House has everything to do with his father’s abortive campaign in 1968 (”Brainwashed” out of the running) and hasn’t the slightest idea what he would do if he actually won the job.


2 posted on 02/24/2012 9:20:25 AM PST by katana (Just my opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Resettozero

They probably want Obama to be re-elected because then 2016 will be an open election and they can go all orgasmic over Chris Christie (or some other worthless moderate) as the nominee.

They want to kill the Tea Party and keep the gravy train flowing. They either want one of their own (Romney) or to have Obama reelected. They won’t stand for any other eventuality, although we may force them to.


3 posted on 02/24/2012 9:23:11 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Resettozero

Many on FR have recognized Boehner & Company will cleave only to their own power, satisfied with one of two, RINO Romney or Obama, either with whom they expect to oversee the fall of America, manage the chaos, remaining quite secure, ensconced and undisturbed in power.


4 posted on 02/24/2012 9:27:31 AM PST by RitaOK (LET 'ER RIP, NEWT. Newt knows where all the bodies are buried, because he buried them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Resettozero

“He is a man who seemingly entered the race because, after a long and successful working life, he could think of nothing more impressive to top it all off than being President of the United States.”

That’s it! THAT’s what my visceral reaction to the guy has been. No, no, and hell no.


5 posted on 02/24/2012 9:28:15 AM PST by jagusafr ("Write in Palin and prepare for war...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Resettozero

Many on FR have recognized Boehner & Company will cleave only to their own power, satisfied with one of two, RINO Romney or Obama, either with whom they expect to oversee the fall of America, manage the chaos, remaining quite secure, ensconced and undisturbed in power.


6 posted on 02/24/2012 9:28:34 AM PST by RitaOK (LET 'ER RIP, NEWT. Newt knows where all the bodies are buried, because he buried them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Resettozero

Best analysis of the turmoil on the Right I’ve seen. The Establishment’s failure to call out the fraud zer0 on his obvious ineligibility will be the straw that breaks the camel’s back.


7 posted on 02/24/2012 9:30:05 AM PST by kreitzer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Resettozero

Another reason I believe that a true Conservative third-party is inevitable. The sooner we set about making the GOP irrelevant the better.


8 posted on 02/24/2012 9:31:53 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Resettozero

I learned a new word from reading this: desuetude.


10 posted on 02/24/2012 9:39:05 AM PST by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Resettozero
Good article. A few choice excerpts follow...

The aim is to keep moral questions out of the equation, thus preserving the long-standing Washington charade of optics politics, in which two factions argue about whether the noose around America’s neck ought to hang twenty feet high, or ten feet, while the public, oblivious in its cell, enjoys its last meal while staring at “American Idolatry” and “Dancing with the Dimwits.”
...
The Establishment, body and soul, has a vested interest in maintaining the status quo. And this means they need to corner the market on “conservative” principle and policy.
...
Today’s constitutional conservatives threaten to end the parlor game. They have committed the faux pas of noticing that their national story is about to end, and of objecting—forcefully—to the quality of leadership that has brought things to this bleak prospect.
...
If the Establishment does not get what it wants through the Party’s own process, it has a fall-back option: Undermine the Republican candidate, and accept a short-term loss in the form of four more years of President Obama. They did it to John McCain; if you think they would not do it again—and even more aggressively—to a constitutional conservative, think again.
...

12 posted on 02/24/2012 9:45:41 AM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Resettozero

Col. Powell ... the establishment


13 posted on 02/24/2012 9:46:08 AM PST by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: onyx

Here’s an excellent article, worthy of a mega-ping.


16 posted on 02/24/2012 11:22:37 AM PST by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Resettozero

I’ve read this article a second time and, even though it’s Friday evening here, I think others FReeper would benefit from reading this. This kind of well-thought-out and complete article doesn’t come out every day, or every week.


22 posted on 02/24/2012 1:43:39 PM PST by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Resettozero

But Michael Medved says there is no “establisment” republicans. He says its a myth. Hey, he said it, not me.


23 posted on 02/24/2012 2:14:45 PM PST by subterfuge (BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Resettozero
Romney can and will do nothing to awaken people from the profound moral desuetude that is bringing the abyss closer every day

Romney can and will do nothing to awaken people from the profound moral desuetude that is bringing the abyss closer every day. And, strange as it may seem, that’s just why the Republican Establishment chose him. It must not be forgotten that, at the very beginning of the primary process, back at the 2011 CPAC Conference, the Establishment-manufactured man of the moment was Mitch Daniels. “Mitch Who?” asked those genuine conservatives who smelled a rat. It was understood, and made explicit by prominent Establishment voices, that he was the man precisely because he spoke like a reasonable fiscal manager—while simultaneously speaking out strongly against allowing the so-called “social conservative” agenda to play a role in the 2012 election.

Awake! Awake! Awake from your profound moral desuetude that is bringing the abyss closer every day!

No presidential candidate is going to be able to do that. At least none of the candidates running now (and probably nobody who uses the word "desuetude").

For all this talk about McCain and Dole and the establishment, this year looks like Dole all over again, with Gingrich, say, constantly lecturing voters about their morality. Gingrich or Santorum may take it further than Dole, who had his own skeletons in the closet, but it won't work this time any better than it did in 1996.

We may be headed towards the abyss, but voters don't pick candidates who keep telling us that. And do you really think any of the current candidates really could effect the kind of changes in the public mind that Jonescu assumes a President can?

The cheap shot at Daniels is undeserved. He may not have been an ideal candidate, but he knew that himself. To look for a candidate who's actually in office, who's actually had to balance budgets and meet payrolls is only common sense.

Run down everybody who actually has administrative experience in favor of speechmakers who don't know how to do anything in the real world and you get -- well, you get what we've got now. Ronald Reagan, who had to balance budgets and meet payrolls wouldn't have gone in for cheap shots like this.

25 posted on 02/24/2012 2:45:37 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Resettozero
after a long and successful working life, he could think of nothing more impressive to top it all off than being President of the United States.

I don't think his goal is the presidency. He "deserves" the nomination. I don't think he has any illusions about beating the kenyan as someone who can implement communist policies more efficiently than the incumbent. He is like Dole and McCain. Neither actually wanted to be president. They both felt they deserved the honor of being Nominated but didn't really want to hold the office.

29 posted on 02/24/2012 3:41:37 PM PST by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson