Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gene Eric; DNA.2012

So you are actually promoting marriage as having no definition at all, any church, any religion, any cult, issues their own definition, of course what power would insist and enforce that only religious entities can define marriage anyway, why not anybody, any group, and household?

Islamic and Mormon, and FLDS child marriage and Polygamy, homosexual marriage, and stuff that we cannot even name or imagine.


38 posted on 02/25/2012 1:56:19 AM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12

You a big fan of

A) not addressing questions while expecting others to

and

B) making up big long lists and pretending that someone else said them


40 posted on 02/25/2012 2:03:56 AM PST by DNA.2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: ansel12

>> So you are actually promoting marriage as having no definition at all.

I made it clear that ‘homosexual marriage’ is a degenerate term. Any man that chooses to marry more than one woman at a time should be committed. And children are protected from pedophiles. What now, my statist FRiend?


43 posted on 02/25/2012 2:09:08 AM PST by Gene Eric (Newt/Sarah 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson