I don’t get it. What’s wrong with mentioning the nice trees in Michigan? According to the article he’s mentioned Michigan trees twice this year, once in 2008 and once in 2011. BIG DEAL ALREADY! Sheesh....
Romneybot begone!
What’s wrong is that he tries to pass himself off as one of us at election time, when he left the state 45 years ago. Why doesn’t he talk more about his time as Massachusetts governor.
“I don’t get it. What’s wrong with mentioning the nice trees in Michigan?”
Well, Mr. Romneybot, there are three things wrong with it.
1) It sounds completely retarded (because it is).
2) Political opportunist pandering to a local electorate is fine to a certain extent but if the best pandering you can do is mention the height of trees (or feel compelled to mention it at all) then you have no clue what the locals want to hear. I am quite certain the people of Michigan will cast their votes on a myriad of issues and trees ain’t it.
3) I can only infer that he believes the trees where I live are NOT the right height. Anyone with half a brain knows that only Kentucky has trees that are just the right height. Of this, there can be no question.