To: aruanan
Geez, wherever you carried the round, the physics would remain the same for the round since that is something from one part of the universe you're carrying into another part--the physics are inherent in the physical materials of which the round is constructed. Besides, it's called UNI verse for a reason.If physics differed based on spatial location, the materials would behave differently. It's not like you carry a little bit of spatial immunity around!
Besides, the UNIVERSE stands for
Understanding
No
Inclination of
Virtually
Everything to
React the
Same,
Everywhere
Q.E.D.
54 posted on
02/25/2012 5:06:18 PM PST by
Lazamataz
(If unemployment helps the economy, like the W.H. says, then CONTRACTING CANCER MAKES YOU HEALTHIER!)
To: Lazamataz
If physics differed based on spatial location, the materials would behave differently. It's not like you carry a little bit of spatial immunity around!
Yeah, "if," the longest word in the English language. And the evidence that physics could differ based on spatial location as opposed to a qualitatively different environment?
56 posted on
02/25/2012 5:14:50 PM PST by
aruanan
To: Lazamataz
If I’m traveling at the speed of light and I shoot a subsonic round...would that be, like, really lame or something?
80 posted on
02/25/2012 6:31:43 PM PST by
Larry Lucido
(My doctor told me to curtail my Walpoling activities.)
To: Lazamataz; aruanan
Unfortunately, Laz, you ignored a key part of aruanan’s argument, which is your downfall here.
>>Besides, it’s called UNI verse for a reason.
Peter Noone covered this well when he asserted “Second verse, same as the first.” In other words, any other part of the verse would be the same as the first (uni) one, therefore no change in the physics.
Q.E.D. indeed!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson