Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Skepolitic

You also have to take into account the gases (and particles) ejected from the muzzle.


81 posted on 02/25/2012 6:37:14 PM PST by Sigurdrifta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: Sigurdrifta

You’re right!

Assuming that all of the powder reacts and is ejected from the muzzle, I suppose that the ratio should be relative to the inertial mass of the cartridge minus the inertial mass of the casing.

I suppose that, since the question posed was for a 45, one also has to take into account the ejection of the cartridge as well.


97 posted on 02/25/2012 7:50:55 PM PST by Skepolitic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

To: Sigurdrifta

You’re right!

Assuming that all of the powder reacts and is ejected from the muzzle, I suppose that the ratio should be relative to the inertial mass of the cartridge minus the inertial mass of the casing.

I suppose that, since the question posed was for a 45, one also has to take into account the ejection of the casing as well.


98 posted on 02/25/2012 7:51:18 PM PST by Skepolitic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson