Posted on 02/26/2012 11:51:04 AM PST by SeekAndFind
>> “My brother, for one, saw George W. Bush in the White House as a major step toward theocracy. He thought we were becoming like Iran — because Bush was a strong Christian. To my brother, this was just wrong.” <<
.
Your brother was one confused dude!
George Bush was, at best, a symbolic Christian. He didn’t even understand that Allah is not God, but a synonym for Satan.
Santorum has talked so much on this issue that he contradicts himself frequently. They are now saying on a political talk show I’m watching, that he has contradicted himself in speeches he’s given this week on his position on funding for contraception. He just can’t help himself. Political expediency, thy name is Rick Santorum.
BTW, thanks for reposting my favorite picture of Rick’s riviting church speech. It never fails to make me LOL!
This is just a devastatingly poisonous quote to be used against Rick in the general election. I know that the soft Democrats here in Pennsylvania adore JFK. JFK is why a lot of them became Democrats in the first place. Saying anything negative about JFK is poison to trying to get that moderate vote in the general election.
The Bible told man not to Murder long before the state told man not to Murder... so is that the Church ruling the state or man ruling based in ideals learned from God and in Church?
Maybe he misremembered and just had a tummy ache from a bad bottle of Gerber’s.
I wonder WHICH Church he is referring to? Also, it very clear the Founding Fathers were opposed to ANY CHURCH having a role in "the operation of the state".
This man must not receive the GOP nomination. His stance is against the Constitution and it's founding intent.
Santorum must be stopped.
ABC is laughing at him. I wish people could open their eyes in what is happening. The media again picking our nominee. So odd, no mention of Newt; such a shame.
Watch the speech (12 September 1960).
later
...Rick Santorum said today that watching John F. Kennedys speech to the Baptist ministers in Houston in 1960...
Wow! he was watching the speech in 1960? The baby was only 2 years old at that time. He was born on May 10, 1958.
Who knew! A political prodigy nerd at the age of 2. No wonder he is so knowledgeable about everything.
Mark Twain once wrote “When I was young, I could remember everything, whether it happened or not.” He must have been writing about Ricky baby.
Wait, wait....don’t pile on....I know he didn’t actually listen to the speech at the age of 2 but I just could not pass up this opportunity to have fun with a poorly written article.
On second thought....hummmmmmm....maybe he did since he is so intelligent.
RE: When did he experience this “want to throw up” reaction? In 1960?
I would surmise when that it happened much later.
“Santorum keeps trying to force his religious Catholic zealotry and bigotry”
Not close to true according to America.
We have made several updates to our State by State polling Map http://www.conservativestats.com/p/mapping.html #fb
The intent of JFKs speech was to defuse Baptist hatred of the Catholic Church, at least to a certain extend. That coupled with the nomination of Johnson and 80% vote given him by Catholics gave him his narrow victory. Separation of Church and State can be absolute only in that no office holder can be compelled to profess a certain faith. Hence he can swear to or merely affirm his duty to the Constitution. Jefferson in talking about the matter was speaking in Baptist terms of separation, and the wall the kind of hedge that Baptist congregations wanted to put between the individual conscience and the dogs of government. To put it another way, it actually broke down the walls that kept Baptists and Catholics and Jews from participating in national political life, as was the case in Great Britain.
“ABC is laughing at him”
Liberals ALWAYS laugh at religion.
Santorum doesn’t just jump the shark; he owns the shark.
Amen and Amen.
Exactly. The whole purpose to JFK’s speech was to reassure voters that he, a man of the Catholic faith, could and would serve properly as president.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.