“So in 10 weeks we may hear what University and what Dean did this? Wake me up when some specifics are released.”
I also think it would have made more impact if the details accompanied the story. As it stands, it seems more like one of those internet hoaxes that people reading it assume is true but is actually contrived. The anonymity interferes with what could have been a very powerful testimony.
As I read the situation, if Mike Adams were to include details beyond what he did, he would be creating a libelous situation for himself as the situation is not yet resolved. That would be why the name of the particular university, dean, and students involved aren’t given.
It’s not Adams’s university, because he works for UNC Wilmington. BTW, you couldn’t ask for better ratings on Rate My Professor, even from the students who disagree with his politics. He might want to jack up the difficulty of the classes some if the university will let him.
http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRatings.jsp?tid=158835