The atheist-ass that he obviously is-was not "attacking" anyone. If lampooning someone's faith rises to incitement I've got a lifetime of free boxing practice with live punching bags, and that's just if I limit myself to the MSNBC editorial staff. Free speech is free speech. Had the atheist been inside a mosque I could see your point. But he wasn't. Mr. Atheist was in a public place. He was breaking no laws and had every right to be secure in his person while he acted out exercised his right to free speech. We don't have to like what he was saying to defend him.
This “judge” is totally incompetent. He can’t even look at simple 5th grade facts and see obvious guilt.
You’ll notice there is no contesting of the facts that the Muslim attacked the parading costumer of Muhammad.
The nitwit judge simply states that the defendant thought he was right. The judge has no other evidence for a “not guilty” charge. He also shows lack of judicial temperament by opining that the attacked man was a “doofus”
This “judge” is totally incompetent. He can’t even look at simple 5th grade facts and see obvious guilt.
You’ll notice there is no contesting of the facts that the Muslim attacked the parading costumer of Muhammad.
The nitwit judge simply states that the defendant thought he was right. The judge has no other evidence for a “not guilty” charge. He also shows lack of judicial temperament by opining that the attacked man was a “doofus”