Skip to comments.
Startup Envia battery promises to slash EV costs
CNET ^
| February 26, 2012
| Martin LaMonica
Posted on 02/27/2012 12:27:30 PM PST by AJFavish
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
1
posted on
02/27/2012 12:27:40 PM PST
by
AJFavish
To: AJFavish
Envia Systems' batteries are being evaluated by a number of automakers, including its largest investor General Motors, according to CEO Atul Kapadia. General Motors: AKA The American Taxpayers
To: AJFavish
:: cutting EV battery pack prices in half in three or four years. ::
Lower cost is not what’s needed. It’s higher capacity.
3
posted on
02/27/2012 12:33:55 PM PST
by
Cletus.D.Yokel
(Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations - The acronym explains the science.)
To: AJFavish
Say they make the most fan-tabulous battery that has ever been known to man - so what? How do they propose to charge this battery?
Correct me if I’m wrong, but aren’t we still dependant upon foreign (and generally hostile) counties for our energy needs? How about finding more efficient generators? Or developing LENR or new technologies to meet the demands for energy that are fast approaching?
Where is the research into Thorium Reactors? At least, there is something we have a high degree of confidence in seeing a return for our investment.
4
posted on
02/27/2012 12:36:11 PM PST
by
Hodar
( Who needs laws; when this FEELS so right?)
To: AJFavish
Its tests have also shown that its batteries perform well after 400 cycles, Kapadia said. Well, that's sold me...........not...........
5
posted on
02/27/2012 12:37:31 PM PST
by
Red Badger
(If you are unemployed long enough, you are no longer unemployed.)
To: AJFavish
Do they come with fire extinguishers?
6
posted on
02/27/2012 12:37:31 PM PST
by
quantim
(Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
To: Cletus.D.Yokel
Lower cost is not whats needed. Its higher capacity.I want both.
7
posted on
02/27/2012 12:38:28 PM PST
by
UCANSEE2
(Lame and ill-informed post)
To: Hodar
How do they propose to charge this battery?Well, you put a fan blade on a generator and mount it on the back trunklid.
8
posted on
02/27/2012 12:40:15 PM PST
by
UCANSEE2
(Lame and ill-informed post)
To: UCANSEE2
Cost won’t matter to the target niche market buyers...smug, trust-find, whities.
9
posted on
02/27/2012 12:41:11 PM PST
by
Cletus.D.Yokel
(Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations - The acronym explains the science.)
To: AJFavish
How long before the layoffs and/or bankruptcy?
10
posted on
02/27/2012 12:41:47 PM PST
by
matt04
To: AJFavish
All they need is a few billion of your tax dollars and in five or ten years they may have something.
To: AJFavish
What are the chances they’re going to apply for a huge government loan, pay themselves lavish salaries, and go bankrupt?
Nah, couldn’t happen.
12
posted on
02/27/2012 12:42:20 PM PST
by
Jack of all Trades
(Hold your face to the light, even though for the moment you do not see.)
To: UCANSEE2
What’s the average distance and electric can travel without a recharge?
To: UCANSEE2
“How do they propose to charge this battery?”
Peter Gleick thinks that once you get the car going, you can just stick a hand held generator connected to a pinwheel out the window...wire it to the batteries, and you can go forever.
To: Cletus.D.Yokel
I've read some interesting articles about batteries that use carbon foam on the insides. The increased surface area makes for a greater electric capacity.
But all that aside, it still doesn't matter. The electricity still needs to be produced, somewhere (and within the constraints of an aging infrastructure and rampany NIMBYism). And, it still needs to be delivered to the batteries, somehow.
Inasmuch as they wish they could, greenies can't get around those pesky laws of physics. Or, their own self-immolation via enviro-worship.
15
posted on
02/27/2012 12:46:27 PM PST
by
wbill
To: AJFavish
Even the lithium ion battery in your laptop is a fire hazard because of the energy density.
16
posted on
02/27/2012 12:47:38 PM PST
by
babygene
(Figures don't lie, but liars can figure...)
To: AJFavish
Several pictures of Envia Motors EV Drive-train:
The White House is planning to grant the company $456M in taxpayer money for product development.
17
posted on
02/27/2012 1:06:46 PM PST
by
pabianice
(")
To: AJFavish; All
I hate to get all Beckinstine on you all, but we need to research
:* Everyone on their Board
* All their "Partners"
* And how they are connected to DOE and or the Obamatons, and or their Green Soro's Allies / Organizations.
18
posted on
02/27/2012 1:11:48 PM PST
by
taildragger
(( Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
To: Hodar
I doubt that 10% of the people here at FR know what a Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor (LFTR) is and probably less than 1% of the general population. For those of you who don't:
LFTR.
19
posted on
02/27/2012 1:37:16 PM PST
by
reg45
(Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class!)
To: Da Coyote
Or maybe the car can harness static electricity to keep the battery running, as Ayn Rand imagined 55 years ago.
20
posted on
02/27/2012 1:52:09 PM PST
by
AuH2ORepublican
(If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson