Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rlmorel

Engaging a penetrating bomber as in the intercept you describe involves different tactics than engaging another fighter in close quarters. You are correct, altitude is an advantage in a dog fight scenario. Trading airspeed for altitude may be an appropriate tactic in some fights depending on the capabilities of the adversary.


37 posted on 03/02/2012 2:28:01 PM PST by pasodave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: pasodave

I admit I am stuck in WWII era tactics, but I do have a copy of “Fighter Combat: Tactics and Maneuvering” by Robert Shaw written in 1985, so I imagine they still teach energy management.

That said, I humbly defer to those who have more recent, actual involvement in these things...:)


38 posted on 03/02/2012 2:33:18 PM PST by rlmorel ("A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson