Skip to comments.Obama appointee upholds controversial NLRB rule
Posted on 03/02/2012 1:47:35 PM PST by Miami Vice
A federal judge appointed by President Obama has upheld the National Labor Relation Board's power to enforce its ...
(Excerpt) Read more at legalnewsline.com ...
What a surprise. A takeover of the country by the judiciary....
Perhaps more than one line of the article might be appropriate.
There are plenty of lines. Just click on the link. Or are you one of those “I want something for nothing” people. If you are then go to Democratunderground with the rest of the liberal freeloaders.
You pal obviously have no conception of what this forum is all about.
You might take your shilling shiny hiney elsewhere.
Is the headline posted the same as at the site cause the link provided just takes me to the home page and I’m going to have to search for the article. Sorry if this sounds like I’m whining but I’m on an iPhone and it’s just a bit of a pain.
Can't count very high?
Most newspaper articles run about 350 words. Too lazy to read???
I know you can click on the link because you have the ability to ask for handouts. Your problem is you just want something for nothing. You want everybody doing things for you.
Go with the rest of the liberal freeloaders. True conservatives do not whine about having to do something.
I know you are a bum that wants people to do things for you. These people are called liberals.
I just clicked on the read more at... and it took me to the article. I do not know about iPhones.
You’re busted. I’ve looked at your posting history and it’s always a line or two from “Legal Newsline”.
Youu’re either a sock puppet or a shill for that site and that crap isn’t tolerated around here.
The info has been forwarded to the administration moderators so I’d watch my step if I were you.
Like the ones that use Free Republic to get blog hits without contributing to Free Republic itself? Those freeloaders?
True conservatives do not whine about having to do something.
Something like providing a decent excerpt or posting the full text?
You're busted, pal.
Your initial post sucked, but I have to give you credit for spawning the most entertaining thread I’ve seen today.
Washington, DC (March 2, 2012)
Today, a federal judge upheld the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB) power to enforce its controversial new rule requiring virtually every employer in the country to post biased information about employee rights online and in the workplace, even if they’ve never committed a violation or been accused of unfair labor practices.
The judge ruled that, if an employer fails to post the notice, it can be found to have committed an unfair labor practice and that fact can be used as evidence of “anti-union animus” in other cases in which an employer is accused of violating federal labor law.
The National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation in conjunction with the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) filed the lawsuit challenging the notice posting rules with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.
Patrick Semmens, Legal Information Director of the National Right to Work Foundation, had the following statement in the wake of the judge’s ruling:
“It is unfortunate that the court rubberstamped the Obama NLRB’s rule, giving union bosses another tool to push workers into forced union dues ranks, and threatening employers if they dont display biased pro-compulsory unionism propaganda on their property.
Thanks kcvl, you’re a gentleman and a scholar.