Thanks for the link. Read the order and it indicates the cause isn’t yet “ripe” as the appeal requests Obozo be eliminated from the PRIMARY BALLOT.
Trust me when I tell you that this thing is far from over. These judges can only stonewall for just so long.
And with citizens in over a dozen states going after Obozo on this, we may get lucky and actually find a judge or two who STILL reveres the Constitution.
Yes, I saw that as well. What troubles me is what the judge goes on to say on page 3.
“Moreover, is it well established . . . that voters vote on ‘presidential electors’ rather than voting directly for a candidate.”
I fear that the judge is leaving wiggle room to not have to apply Georgia law to presidential candidates at any point in the process. It makes me so mad that a judge be wiling to so radically contort the plain language of the law as to render completely useless a provision clearly meant to guarantee citizens a right to have a candidate’s credentials validated. How can people like this continue to be given a pass by the system? Will not the state legislators recoil at so corrupt a misuse of judicial power?
No. No one who has any power seems to care.
If there is to be any hope, I suggest that the Georgia state legislators act quickly to reinforce the language in the qualifications challenge code in such a way that it leaves no doubt that “candidates” in an electorally based election are also completely subject to the challenge and review process.
Of course, all indications continue to be that, in short, there is no hope.