She siad $3000 during law school. I imagine that is based on a monthly cost, which is how contraceptives are typically purchased, not a “per act” cost.
It just seems that by shifting the argument away from actual facts and venturing into name-calling, there is no way to have an honest debate about the issue. Kind of counterproductive, don’t you think?
even when you figure monthly cost...the figure is way off.
That is why she is getting so much flack.
She lied about who she is.
She lied about coverage being denied for real medical conditioins.
She lied about the cost.
She failed to mention she has been an activist for years.
She presented women as sex machines who can’t help themselves.
What else are we supposed to think?
It was a cringe-inducing spectacle that the libs tried to paint as heart-wrenching and critical for “all” women.
She - and they- deserve ridicule and scorn.
Should the terms “slut” or “prostitute” been bandied about?
Probably not...the argument could have been made without that.
Meanwhile....Bill Maher plods on despite the vitriolic things he as said, including referring to Sarah Palin as a “tw*t”
And Sarah Palin didn’t even go before congress asking for them to finance her promiscuous sex life.
If she wants to embrace her sluthood on national TeeVee, who are we to stand in her way?
>She siad $3000 during law school. I imagine that is based on a monthly cost, which is how contraceptives are typically purchased, not a “per act” cost.<
Do the math. You can get a prescription for birth control that will set you back $30.00
So the strumpet is so flippin’ dumb it will take her 100 years to get through law school?