Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/04/2012 7:09:38 AM PST by nathanbedford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: nathanbedford

Excellent, as always.


2 posted on 03/04/2012 7:10:45 AM PST by ClearCase_guy ("And the public gets what the public wants" -- The Jam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford
I expect in September or October for Obama to use the Iran situation to his political benefit. He will attack Iran to look like a war time president and use that to hope to fool the American people o keep him in power...despite his abject failures in the foreign policy areana and in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The loathing I have for a man who would put young Americna patriots lives at risk for his own political gain, particularly when that gain is aimed at the fundamental change and destruction of our Constititonal Republic is beyond what I can post on this forum.

God grant the American people to see through it and not be fooled.

3 posted on 03/04/2012 7:17:51 AM PST by Jeff Head (Liberty is not free. Never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford

bfl


4 posted on 03/04/2012 7:17:56 AM PST by llandres (Forget the "New America" - restore the original one!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford

Just saw Newt address just this question on meet the press. He was asked how this comment separates him from the President. Newt stated that he can’t answer the question. He pointed out that he does not know what that means. Or. something along those lines.

I guess the best response is that when Obama speaks, it is nothing more than “words, just words.”


5 posted on 03/04/2012 7:18:40 AM PST by vg0va3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford

He doesn’t bluff? That’s all he did during the 2008 campaign. He can’t be serious.


6 posted on 03/04/2012 7:22:11 AM PST by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford

I will share this.


8 posted on 03/04/2012 7:26:32 AM PST by mission9 (It is by the fruit ye shall know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford
It will be almost impossible to convince the public that they should vote against Obama's reelection by arguing that his motives were corrupt even as we concede that his policy was correct.

Hows about we try convincing the public that they should try electing a man who will continue the correct policies but without the corruption?

11 posted on 03/04/2012 7:34:53 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford

Agreed. Barack Obama does nothing without first weighing the pros and cons as to how his actions may affect his political prospects. He is a hrad-core leftist for whom the end justifies whatever means are necessary to achieve it. He will have no compunctions over taking the US to war with Iran to save his political hide. The autocratic Iranian government needs to be put down, with extreme prejudice - it has conducted asymmetric war against us since the feckless Jimmy Carter did nothing about the November 4, 1979 takeover of the US Embassy in Tehran. However, Americans should not trust that Barack Obama and his advisors will do it because of a dire threat to Israel and to the USA. When it comes to Obama, there can be no trust, only vigilance.


12 posted on 03/04/2012 7:37:12 AM PST by astounded (Barack Obama as POTUS is a clear and present danger to the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford

Agreed, he’ll wage war with Iran to win office again. The question is if he can wait until October.


13 posted on 03/04/2012 7:40:33 AM PST by Caipirabob (I say we take off and Newt the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford

All bets are off if Israel attacks Iran first. Obama would do nothing. I agree that his response to the resulting Mid East firestorm would be to empty the Strategic Petroleum Reserves.


15 posted on 03/04/2012 7:45:32 AM PST by Paisan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford
Outstanding analysis.

Please read (and save) my damning "J'accuse" of the Obama regime, Murdergate, and the liberal media establishment that protects the murdering leftist criminals.

Gangster Government, And Sakharov's Immunity.

http://www.enemiesforeignanddomestic.com/efadGG.htm

I wrote and published it one day before the "death by natural causes" of Andrew Breitbart, while he was taking a routine evening walk alone near his home.

Matt Bracken, AKA Travis McGee on Free Republic


24 posted on 03/04/2012 9:20:50 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford
Excellent writing.

After watching the talking heads this morning, you have almost brought me back to reality. This a big thing for me.

I consider myself as a wayfaring stranger in this world...I believe I still am.

Kudos

FMCDH(BITS)

27 posted on 03/04/2012 9:59:23 AM PST by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford
Candidates should do a preemptive strike on Obummer, keep pounding on the issue, any strike against Iran between now and November, would be purely political to increase his chances of reelection, make the issue obvious, any assault between now and November, would be a day late and a dollar short. Force him to concede he intends to attack, after all he said he doesn't bluff, call him on it.
28 posted on 03/04/2012 10:21:49 AM PST by PoloSec ( Believe the Gospel: how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford

bump

Added keyword: octobersurprise


32 posted on 03/07/2012 12:36:32 AM PST by Gene Eric (Newt/Sarah 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford
I don't see Obama attacking without international support and Congressional authorization. As I don't see Russia and China signing on, I don't believe that military action will occur.

A nuclear Iran will not make liberal Jews walk away from Obama. In their minds, it will bind the US and Israel. It will be too late to attack Iran. Israel's security will depend on American security promises. These promises will depend on bipartisan goodwill, which will keep Jewish Democrats in line. America can make these security guarantees provisional on Israeli concessions to the Palestinians in the Piece of Israel at a time Process. Independent Jews may vote Republican this election, but a 20% shift in Jewish votes is unlikely to make a difference in Ohio or Pennsylvania. The press will still be in the tank for Obama. Any lost Jewish donations will be inconsequential given the donations of corporations that have benefited from the regime.

34 posted on 03/11/2012 8:12:36 PM PDT by rmlew ("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson