“Tell me is that fair, balanced, objective? Which criteria did Wallace meet when he mentioned the one year where Obama actually made substantial donations to charity?”
He gave Santorum an opportunity to address the difference that will surely be part of a presidential race should Santorum get the convention nod. He’s a politician. Hit him with whatever you got, see what happens. He did ok. Do you object to your candidate getting hit with tough questions? How would it have helped Santorum to pitch softball to him?
LOL, you joking? I’m all for tough questions but I am just as against shilling for Obama. Do you think Wallace gave an objective view of Obama’s charitable giving before anybody was watching? Knowing the answer to that question I’ll simply move on to the next question. Why did Wallace hide the fact from the viewer that Obama and his wife wwere cheap bastards before he ran for national office and had Bill Ayers write him a book to cash in?