re: There is zero doubt she is promoting promiscuity.
Are you for that or against it?
_________________________________
Let’s get some things clear:
IN Sandra Fluke’s testimony,
1) She did not say that SHE HERSELF needed thousands/year in contraception.
2) She did say that others did and are having a hard time paying for such lifestyle.
3) She was speaking on behalf of those others.
Therefore, the question should be this -— what do you call someone who speaks for others to be sexually promiscuous at tax payer’s expense?
Good analysis.
The government is no more obligated to pay (or in fact obligated to pay by regulation that requires a private party to pay) for one particular lifestyle more than any other.
Grandmothers like to knit. Doesn’t in any way oblige the government to support them.
If you call for the government to subsidize or regulate behavior, then you are calling for the government to CONTROL behavior!!
Yes, and that's where she trapped Rush.
2) She did say that others did and are having a hard time paying for such lifestyle. 3) She was speaking on behalf of those others.
I read that she was coming at it from a medical perspective. That said I think she's a dangerous operative from the progressive left. She should be derided for her views. Rush calling her a slut incorrectly (she may actually be one but her testimony doesn't reveal that) has caused more damage than if he had done it from the Constitutional perspective.