Sorry, I don't do loyalty oaths. But feel free to look at my posting record here at FR. You see I'm one of those people who actually has what it takes to post under my own name nomatter where I post. Being consistently conservative and respecting the truth no matter what it is makes it very easy to do that. Try it some time.
If you value truth then you should try to understand why conservatives would be annoyed at the liberal media pushing the liberal Bishop Romney by calling his required, and evil, cult financial support as merely “charity” to the unsuspecting public.
Last night I looked at Romney’s “charity” giving, it was almost a pure, self serving collection of cult support.
As a conservative, I would like the conservative base to know a little more about what the New York Times is calling charity, in Bishop Romney’s case.
The left is using Romney’s cult support to portray him as a super charity giver, for one thing a minimum 10% of his income HAS to go to the cult, or he does not become a GOD, and the cult can require him to supply his tax returns if they think he is holding out. Mitt’s father gave 19% of his income to the cult, in return we have the Mormons advancing two Romney Presidential candidates in a row.
Romney gets real support from the cult, including not just manpower but the millions they are spending during his campaign in coordination with his advertising.
As far as your name. This is the internet. Just because you "say something"...doesn't make it true.
Did you understand my post? Not sure you did.