Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Yo-Yo

Ms. Fluke is likely a “limited-purpose public figure,” since she put herself in the middle of a public debate over a mater of public controversy. This might not fully protect Rush (as Ms. Fluke’s lawyers would argue that his comments about her personal sexual behavior went far beyond her testimony, which concerned other womens’ use of contraceptives for medical purposes other than preventing pregnancy), but it would probably be difficult for Fluke to win a defamation case here.

Of course, if she sued, Rush may be forced to settle - the MSM would spin any defense he presented as “defending his right to call a weak, defenseless student a slut,” and it may ultimately be more costly to Rush (as well as his advertisers, etc.) to fight the lawsuit than it would be to just settle quietly.


12 posted on 03/05/2012 10:45:42 AM PST by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Conscience of a Conservative
Ms. Fluke is likely a “limited-purpose public figure,” since she put herself in the middle of a public debate over a mater of public controversy.

And, in a few years, she will be as venerated as Cindy Sheehan is today.

88 posted on 03/05/2012 12:29:16 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson