Sandra Fluke admitted openly, to a congressional committee, that she is openly and extremely promiscuous.
The definition of slut is: “A person, particulalry a woman, considered to be sexually promiscuous.”
So, by her own admission and testimnony she meets the definition.
Perhaps Rush could have been more circumspect or polite in his dialog...but this woman is being used...willingly...to try and change the very fabric of both our freedoms and our mores. She is, wittingly or unwittingly, an enemy to the very fabric of our free society. To speak directly to such is not a crime, and should not be shyed away from.
I do not believe Rush owed an apology. He should simply have explained it in these very direct and factual terms and indicated that if Sandra does not want to be considered by others to be the very deifinition of a slut, then perhaps she should not act like one and openly admit to being that very thing, before congress no less.
Words have meaning. Actions have consequences.
When I was youung, this type of behavior was considered very wrong and looked down upon. It led to broken families and bastard children who had one or two strikes against them (and even today, if you look at the statistics, the same holds true) from the get go. Such behavior was called the wrong it is and society sought to limit it as a result.
Now today, the people engaged in such behavior not only do not want it called wrong, they want to be held up as an example of courage to do what they “feel”. And President’s (at least this one) points to it and lauds it and disparages those who call it what it really is.
Well, it turns our Miss Fluke is an activist on these matters. She considers and calls herself a, “reproductive rights activists,” whatever that means...though it is clear that she is not in favor or advocating reproduction at all...but the opposite. It also turns out that she advocates for the public, meaning all of us taxpayers, to be put on the lamb to pay for all gender change operations that anyone desire too. But that part of her agenda isn’t being discussed...yet.
America at the Crossroads of History
http://www.jeffhead.com/crossroads.htm
If I were President, Here’s what I’d do
http://www.jeffhead.com/aspres.htm
The Man who Depsises America
http://www.jeffhead.com/obama-time.htm
We need to focus on the activism. She did not admit to being promiscuous - here’s the money quote from her testimony: “Without insurance coverage, contraception, as you know, can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school. For a lot of students who, like me, are on public interest scholarships, that’s practically an entire summer’s salary.”
A close reading (remember - she’s training to be a lawyer) shows that she doesn’t directly state that she PERSONALLY experienced any of this. Read the rest of her testimony - it’s all about “women told me” this, and “we were told” that - complete and utter hearsay that can’t be proved or disproved.
Rush screwed up in focusing on this woman’s sex life - she never actually said anything about her personal situation. The issue is that she is a far-left Democrat operative who was used to help create a narrative that “Republicans hate women!!” with a whole bunch of completely fabricated stories about cost, hardship, etc.