Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

If you’re saying that demand didn’t change much because of price, then I’d still want to see graphs showing how nearly equal production and supply were in the summer of 2008, and that was why everybody was fighting for the last tanker, which would be an astonishing coincidence with the known SemGroup disaster but an acceptable rebuttal.

Then I’d want to see how all of a sudden, again coincident with the SemGroup bankruptcy, and even as demand remained constant, the world was suddenly so awash in crude oil that its price collapsed by 80% in a six months.


55 posted on 03/06/2012 1:50:08 PM PST by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: jiggyboy
A very small surplus (or deficit) can cause large swings in price — that's the very definition of in-elasticity. The world needn't be “awash in crude oil”, before prices plummet.
56 posted on 03/06/2012 1:58:20 PM PST by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson