Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hawthorn
The station then called the agent’s bluff, and so he walked.

Then it wasn't a bluff, after all.
31 posted on 03/06/2012 6:51:54 AM PST by Dr. Sivana (May Mitt Romney be the Paul Tsongas of 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Sivana

They should have had Obama in the negotiations. He told Republicans last year “don’t call my bluff” during debt ceiling negotiations, and put the fear of God into the GOP.

And recently, Obama said he doesn’t bluff, as talk of what to do about Iran had happened.

You want tough negotiating, Obama’s your man.


38 posted on 03/06/2012 7:55:47 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Sivana
>> Then it wasn't a bluff, after all. <<

Well yeah, you're correct in one sense:

Ex post, we can say it wasn't a bluff. But -- and here's the critical component -- WMAL wouldn't have knownAs I have always understood the term, and as most dictionaries seem to define it, "calling a bluff" means to make somebody prove if he is serious about a threat -- WHETHER OR NOT the threat is real.

In other words, you "call the bluff" precisely to find out if the other side is bluffing or not.

Or, ex post doesn't equate to ex facto, as we used to say in my logic class. Or was it my Latin class? Can't really recall!

40 posted on 03/06/2012 9:19:46 AM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson