Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republican Split Decision [48% Ohio Republicans "Dissatisfied" if Gingrich Were The GOP Nominee]
Wall St. J ^ | March 08, 2012

Posted on 03/07/2012 6:11:49 PM PST by Steelfish

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: Steelfish

Since the Democrat race was meaningless (except for the Congressional race involving Kucinich and Kaptur), were Democrats able to vote in the Republican primary? In Michigan the Obama forces encouraged Democrats to vote for Santorum to embarrass Romney in his native state. Did they do the same thing in Ohio? Regardless of which candidate they think easiest to beat, they probably want a long-drawn-out primary battle to weaken the eventual nominee.


21 posted on 03/07/2012 8:02:56 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gogogodzilla

Well said! Very true.


22 posted on 03/07/2012 8:07:41 PM PST by Advil000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: gogogodzilla

here i try to think out of the box, reach out w/ an olive branch because of our common enemies (Obama, and Romney who will lose hopelessly to him), look at some creative way to solve a serious conservative political impasse centering on two candidates and their respective camps, discuss as a gentleman, and you have to reply with a snide reply on Santorum’s position. can’t you see the effort that I think is necessary and am trying to perhaps kickstart here? can we knock off the “incoming” friendly fire just for a moment to settle this thing somehow, when we have bigger fish to fry, such as a minor issue as the future of our very Republic? i am not going to get in a pissing contest here or take the bait in terms of debating on Santorum, i am going to stand by my original comment that some kind of meeting of the minds must start.


23 posted on 03/07/2012 8:13:23 PM PST by AmericanInTokyo (Imagine the rationalizations on FR to vote for MITT if he wins the nomination. I think I'd throw up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

Snide, no. This just lays out the fundamental problem between the factions of conservativism.

It’s wishful thinking to try and get small-government conservatives to support candidates that believe in government (Romney, Santorum).

Whereas all the other stripes of conservativism can support, in varying degrees, a candidate that believes in the smallest government possible.

Why no one can see that, I don’t know.


24 posted on 03/07/2012 9:13:23 PM PST by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: gogogodzilla

Buying into Global Warming—what, pray tell,role of GOVERNMENT is there in the mind of any purveyors—anyone who signs on or signed on in the past, to such academic hogwash?


25 posted on 03/08/2012 2:31:09 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo (Romney and Obama and elites licking chops over their successful "divide and conquer" strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: gogogodzilla

But this is tantamount to saying we need to coalesce around a man who can’t consistently garner more than 15% of Republican primary voters.

This is our problem. Newt’s got the best ideas, has the best intellect and is the best debater of the four candidates.

Yet he’s not connecting. All he’s doing is splitting the conservative vote and allowing Mittens to sneak and shuffle his way to the nomination.

Sorry, I know this is close to heresy, but we gotta think whether we’d prefer a conservative in the White House or 4 more years of Obama.

And I got news for you. Rick IS a conservative. If he wasn’t, he wouldn’t be the pick of the Republican party in places like Oklahoma and Tennessee.


26 posted on 03/08/2012 3:17:39 AM PST by fuzzy dunlop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: fuzzy dunlop
I don't have the time to do it unfortunately; if we had somebody like "Alamo Girl" active or another super Freeper-researcher, it would be interesting to do something akin to this:

Go back to the very beginning of Free Republic.

Find all articles that are either tagged "Santorum" or have "Rick Santorum" is the key person of discussion in the article and then the FReeper discussion thread that follows.

Total these all up.

Then look at the number of posts in each of these articles and get a predominental sentiment overview from within the comments, then furthermore, listing the number of:

a) FR Threads predominently POSITIVE on (then) Senator Santorum and then later former Senator Santorum at the time, since the beginning of FR until this week.

b) FR Threads predominently NEGATIVE on the Senator, since the beginning of FR until this week.

I would like to see just how bashed he was on Free Republic for YEARS on end, as opposed to how he was well-received as a conservative.

I would love to see these figures and extrapolate the larger meaning behind.

I am almost sure that the spike in negative articles or comments or Rick only comes in the last six months or so as very minute part of FR's nearly 14 years of existence, and that the prime reason and only reason they are negative against Rick is because, well, he is not Speaker Gingrich.

Would really love to see the data on this. Of course I do believe there would be a spike of negativity on the vote relating to Arlen Spector without a doubt but I would bet a bottom dollar that Santorum had been of friend of Free Republic for years on end, and now suddenly, in some narrow, selfish and parochial quarters, is the worst man on the facce of the earth, worse than marxist Emperor Obama it seems (I saw people on here who said they would actually vote for Obama over Santorum in such a match up in November. I saw others who said they would vote for Romney over Santorum if Gingrich dropped out. Or just stay home in November if he gained the nomination. Incredible. Just dayam! Moshe Dayam!)

27 posted on 03/08/2012 8:43:04 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo (Romney and Obama and elites licking chops over their successful "divide and conquer" strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: fuzzy dunlop

You basically reiterate my original post... but then demand what is impossible. IE: to have those conservatives who believe in the smallest government possible vote for someone that believes that government is the preferred way to inculcate morality into the populace.

Do you not see the fundamental insanity of trying to do this?


28 posted on 03/08/2012 4:23:16 PM PST by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson