or, in English, "Breibarted"
Things move ever faster as your country circles the drain.
Our Country had been on a long slow slide into Hell. Then Barack Obama was elected. Now the slow slide, is a free fall!
targeted killing without trial = legal, OK
(if a democrat is president)
nonlethal waterboarding = illegal, torture
“I have to go back. Uh, I’m not certain whether that was addressed or not,” Mueller said when asked by Rep. Kevin Yoder, R-Kan., about a distinction between domestic and foreign targeting
*********************
The HEAD of the FBI doesn’t know this?! Who and what the L are we payin’ to run this stuff. Are they THAT inept?
We are in such deep chit...
NDAA. . .3 Reps, 3 Dems and 1 Ind. voted against it. The “us” vs “them” isn’t a Rep vs Dem situation but it’s been a great distraction while the Devil himself does his handiwork. Variations in rhetoric allow different people to get in power, there’s no legit honorable values behind any of the b.s..
Darn good thing the only one who cn exercise the death penalty without traditional due process is the guy who wants to punish his enemies..
Congress better sack-up, grow a pair and defeat this, somehow.
Alright, I’m ready to get flamed. We’ve all seen the movie Bonnie & Clyde (or if you haven’t, you ought to). Wasn’t that a targeted killing? The end, their end, is what I’m talking about. Would you really make that illegal? And for those who don’t know, some people at the time did think it was murder.
Is it really wrong under any circumstances? Remember, the next Republican President is gonna have to live with whatever rules we make now. One of the advantages of having Democrat Presidents from time to time is that they’re allowed to get away with things that Republicans aren’t. Sets a precedent.
No charges.
No trial.
No public review.
You just end up assassinated.
Somehow, I don’t think this is the system the founders had in mind.
What’s new? The BATF has been executing people without trial for decades.
Andrew Breitbart?
Breitbart......
Obama and Holder already crossed the mass-murder Rubicon with Operation Fast and Furious.
Killing “enemies of the regime” in the USA would not make mke them break a sweat.
Please read this, save it, and share it:
“Gangster Government, And Sakharov’s Immunity”
http://www.enemiesforeignanddomestic.com/efadGG.htm
Lemme get this straight.
Holder and Zer0 demand foreign terrorists be given jury trials in the US but domestic terrorists (Holder determines that status)can be assassinated/murdered without any legal recourse?
There are a few things about this targeted killing that are troublesome. First, as I read Holder’s three points, it is not necessary that the target actually commits a crime. In the Fort Hood example, Al Awaki (sp?) arguably gave sermons that inspired the shooter. Think how the DOJ could use this definition combined with an assertion that it’s unlikely that the individual be captured to assassinate most any conservative poster who advocates some type of immediate government change (throw the bum out). It’s a far different criteria the resisting a lawful arrest, resisting officers serving a lawful search warrant. Now I’m talking about the legal standard not the abuses that frequently happen.
IMO this gives a free pass for purely political assassinations.