Posted on 03/10/2012 4:41:49 AM PST by Kaslin
While news yesterday from the Bureau of Labor Statistics that unemployment remained unchanged and that 227,000 jobs were created in February shows that the Obama-induced stimulus slide in the economy has slowed, it also contains some significant bad news for the president.
As the labor participation rates edged back up, the number of people without jobs also edged up a bit too from 12.758 million to 12.806 in the last month. And while the 227,000 jobs created for January is better than less-than-200,000 jobs that we have come to expect, much of the gain is in temporary employment, signaling perhaps, at best a bottom for labor.
But what its not signaling most certainly is a robust recovery.
As our own Mike Shedlock points out, employment in 2012 is roughly the same as it was back in 2001. In essence, Obama has compressed a lost decade into just three years. Additionally, the BLS already is making significant downward revisions to employment for new business estimates they made in the January report via the birth/death model and other seasonal adjustments , according to Shedlock.
And the hanky-pankery isn't just confined to birth/death numbers. As John Crudele of the New York Post reported early this week:
Take, just as a single example, Labors report in early February. It showed that 243,000 new jobs were created in January.
The only problem was that the number wasnt true. The pure, undoctored, not seasonally adjusted figure showed there was really a loss of 2.689 million jobs.
There is always a loss of jobs after the Christmas season. And any professional in the financial industry who doesnt know that needs to get into another line of work.
As Ive reported before, the 2.689 million job loss turned into a gain of 243,000 only because Labors seasonal adjustment programs expected the job losses to be bigger. The warm winter weather probably kept some people from being put out of work, and this threw off Washingtons calculations.
Now heres another brief reminder: Weve been here before with the Obama economy- like last year- and it wont take much- think rising gas prices, Israeli air strike- for the economy to go back into the tank.
So dont count me as one of the people who thinks the employment report is Obamas friend.
In part thats because Obama jettisoned his business-friendly chief-of-staff, Bill Daley, in favor of the more radical, whacko-wing of the White House who is determined to wage a class warfare campaign around spending a ton more money.
And the longer economic conditions remain stable, yet, essentially weak, the more likely it is that Americans are going to reject Obamas massive spending programs and class warfare rhetoric, without which, hed have an administration bereft of any ideas at all.
Obama: Pass MY Jobs Bill!
It wasnt too long ago that the employment crisis was so grave that Chicagos very own Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. was suggesting the president suspend the Constitution. Previously Governor Bev Perdue (Democrat) was suggesting that we suspend elections to address employment, thereby ensuring that she wouldnt get to run for reelection this year. Both were foolish arguments back then and both appear even stupider in light of events.
The biggest crisis that both progressives were concerned with wasnt jobs; its the crisis created by six years of failed policies- the possibility of failed elections.
And thats about the size of it for Obama too.
Its wasnt too long ago that the president was touring the country foolishly demanding that Congress pass his pork-spending bill he called My Jobs Bill 2.0 before letting Congress even read it. Pass my jobs bill now, said the president before he had even delivered a copy of it to Congress- or wrote it.
[I]f you love me, you've got to help me pass this bill," said Obama as he kicked off the desperation reelection tour back in September.
But hey, guess what?
The economy has stopped sliding backward and has added jobs since, primarily because a Republican-controlled Congress has gotten the president to stop screwing around with the economy. Congress has gotten tough with out-of-control regulations like the MACT Act and Dodd-Frank and the economy has started to its proper job.
In the meantime, Obama has somehow misplaced the campaign rhetoric supporting My Jobs Bill along with My Foolish Budget and My Invisible Energy Policy.
Instead hes taken to campaigning about income inequality and tax increases.
And Ill take my chances on those arguments at time when people would be happy to have any rising income, any lower spending and any affordable energy no matter the form.
Tangerine trees and marmalade skies...
How is it that most people see what he and they are doing and the train keeps rolling on and the crickets in DC get louder? The only one in the crowd that is expressing our anger is Newt. Niether the GOP or the rats like Newt, this says alot! Could he be the candidate of the people?
Eatin' rainbow stew in a silver spoon,
Underneath that sky of blue.
All be drinkin' free bubble-up,
An' eatin' that rainbow stew.
Because Newt has too much “baggage” to beat a president whose background includes almost no baggage - just Rev Wright, Bill Ayers, Bernadine Dohrn, Prof Bell, Father Pfleger, Tony Rezko, ACORN, Van Jones, Solyndra, Fast and Furious, etc.
It’s tough to beat someone with an All American background and almost mo scandals. (Is Sarc needed?)
Can't we just increase employment in more permanent jobs like at Acorn, EPA, HUD, MSM, DoE, ...?
Oh, I see... we already are!
I love when obama says, “Under my plan...”
Dumb bass hasn’t even read any of “his” plans or bills.
soetoro is phony -- doesn't have a birth certificate, a college transcript, any old friends he grew up with (at least not American friends) -- in other words, a past history other than the one described in two ghostwritten books.
Obummer is using unspent stimulus funds as his personal checkbook for boondoggles like Solyndra, et al.
When is somebody going to freeze those unspent billions?
Oh wait, that would take a show of spine from Republicans in Congress.
Never mind.
If they had that much spine, they might actually start impeachment proceedings on Holder, Panetta, etc., etc.
the 2.689 million job loss turned into a gain of 243,000 only because Labor's seasonal adjustment programs expected the job losses to be bigger.Heh. Sort of like zero-based budgeting. The actual numbers are transmogrified by being run against a projection; and what is reported as "actual numbers" is the difference between reality and the projection.
Make the projection bad enough (e.g., project a loss of 10 million jobs in March), and the feds can claim a HUGE monthly gain in employment.
Wasn't February jobs created less than January jobs created? How can a decrease be better?
There's a lake of stew
And of whiskey too
You can paddle all around it
In a big canoe
In the Big Rock Candy Mountains
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.