Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dfwgator; Krankor

It shows a terrible lack of confidence to run away from the very premise of your movie in your title. The original title John Carter of Mars is a good title...different and intriguing. Just John Carter...who’s that and what’s the movie about? It’s sort of like Republicans trying to appeal to moderates. We have a unique brand here that could get attention and get people interested, but we’re going to run away from who we are and hide it in order to try to appeal to the type of people who don’t like us. You don’t make a sci-fi movie and then market it is non-sci-fi in the fear that it will only appeal to sci-fi fans. You make a movie that sci-fi fans are so enthusiastic about that other people get curious and wonder what all the fuss is about.


32 posted on 03/11/2012 2:03:43 PM PDT by JediJones (The Divided States of Obama's Declaration of Dependence: Death, Taxes and the Pursuit of Crappiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: JediJones

Imagine if Star Wars was called “Luke Skywalker”.


33 posted on 03/11/2012 2:05:38 PM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: JediJones

-——John Carter...who’s that and what’s the movie about?-——

Exactly right. I knew nothing about it, but caught the commercial today.

I thought:

“John Carter”

Lots of special effects.

What the?

Oh well, who cares.

And that would have been my last impression if I hadn’t read this.


139 posted on 03/11/2012 4:39:08 PM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas (Viva Christo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson