Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: al_c

remind me why the nuclear powered cruisers were decommisioned...


17 posted on 03/12/2012 11:35:23 AM PDT by RitchieAprile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: RitchieAprile
remind me why the nuclear powered cruisers were decommisioned...

Maybe the gubmint wants GM Volt powered cruisers. Or maybe solar. I don't know ........

20 posted on 03/12/2012 12:07:03 PM PDT by al_c (http://www.blowoutcongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: RitchieAprile
remind me why the nuclear powered cruisers were decommisioned.

Expenses and flexibility. All of them needed an upgrade in their electronics to keep up with the Aegis ships. With all the regulations imposed by the greens regarding disposal of nuclear waste, you could build a new Alrigh Burke for the cost of refueling and upgrading the electronics on one of the older nuclear cruisers.

In addition with a conventional power plant you can get repairs done anyplace in the world. Look at Cole, Stark and Roberts. Major hits that could be patched up locally before sending them home for yard work. Now imagine what would have happened if Cole had been a nuke. You just handed Bin Laden and Co. the ability to Fukushima any port we entered. How soon before nobody would let us in?

We use nukes only where there is no alternative. Carriers are so big they need the power. Subs need an AIP power source. But a cruiser can get along with conventional power.
22 posted on 03/12/2012 12:19:37 PM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson