Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Go to Trial: Crash the Justice System
The New York Times ^ | Published: March 10, 2012 | MICHELLE ALEXANDER

Posted on 03/12/2012 4:12:39 PM PDT by MetaThought

More than 90 percent of criminal cases are never tried before a jury.

AFTER years as a civil rights lawyer, I rarely find myself speechless. But some questions a woman I know posed during a phone conversation one recent evening gave me pause: “What would happen if we organized thousands, even hundreds of thousands, of people charged with crimes to refuse to play the game, to refuse to plea out? What if they all insisted on their Sixth Amendment right to trial? Couldn’t we bring the whole system to a halt just like that?” ...

I was stunned by Susan’s question about plea bargains because she — of all people — knows the risks involved in forcing prosecutors to make cases against people who have been charged with crimes. Could she be serious about organizing people, on a large scale, to refuse to plea-bargain when charged with a crime?

“Yes, I’m serious,” she flatly replied. ...

But in this era of mass incarceration — when our nation’s prison population has quintupled in a few decades partly as a result of the war on drugs and the “get tough” movement — these rights are, for the overwhelming majority of people hauled into courtrooms across America, theoretical. More than 90 percent of criminal cases are never tried before a jury. Most people charged with crimes forfeit their constitutional rights and plead guilty.

“The truth is that government officials have deliberately engineered the system to assure that the jury trial system established by the Constitution is seldom used,” said Timothy Lynch, director of the criminal justice project at the libertarian Cato Institute. In other words: the system is rigged.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: jury; legal; plea; pleabargain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

1 posted on 03/12/2012 4:12:52 PM PDT by MetaThought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MetaThought

The Occupy Wall Street freeloaders are going to tear this country down.

Why doesn’t anyone care? :(


2 posted on 03/12/2012 4:16:22 PM PDT by Tzimisce (this sucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MetaThought

I’m surprised it hasn’t happened already.


3 posted on 03/12/2012 4:18:16 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MetaThought

Let’s see... if you go to trial rather than plea-bargaining, especially if you might be found guilty, don’t you risk a higher penalty? Isn’t this essentially what the game theory people call “the prisoner’s dilemma?”


4 posted on 03/12/2012 4:18:31 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MetaThought

Interesting thought.


5 posted on 03/12/2012 4:19:50 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MetaThought
Of course the reason most people DON'T go to trial is because they are offered a deal. I suspect prosecutors would simply start seeking the maximum for everyone that insists on going to trial. By the way, this is only true for local and state courts. In Federal courts people usually beg for a deal.
6 posted on 03/12/2012 4:21:06 PM PDT by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Yes. But, that is one of the reasons we have our such system. Go to trial and face your peers.


7 posted on 03/12/2012 4:21:35 PM PDT by Theoria (Rush Limbaugh: Ron Paul sounds like an Islamic terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MetaThought

I always thought it would be fun to see what would happen if eveyone when to the foodstamp office, welfare and all the other “free stuff” offices and applied, even if we did not need it.


8 posted on 03/12/2012 4:21:47 PM PDT by DirtyPigpen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MetaThought

Works both ways, Obamahole libs.

Just wait....

It’ll be either that...

Or CW II.


9 posted on 03/12/2012 4:22:09 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MetaThought

It’ll never work.

Self-interest always wins, particularly with the criminally self-interested. Nobody’s going to risk a much longer prison sentence on some feeble attempt to crash the system.

SnakeDoc


10 posted on 03/12/2012 4:23:02 PM PDT by SnakeDoctor ("I've shot people I like more for less." -- Raylan Givens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

It’s the carrot/stick game and mostly stick. The state is out to make a buck off your hide and what includes setting up a system that actuaries have calculated will result in “X” number of failures just to justify through system of revolving doors.

Prison and ticketing are industries and someone gets paid at every level.


11 posted on 03/12/2012 4:24:16 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Less if the movement were organized. A group funds the defense and gets a critical mass of people willing to go to trial. Carry the test case concept to the level of an organized challenge to the system. Pick a jurisdiction to focus on, and tear it down. Beyond that, provide for the basic needs of defendents and their families. One reason why they banned the flying wedge: it got results.


12 posted on 03/12/2012 4:24:16 PM PDT by RobbyS (Christus rex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MetaThought

If they would not plea down criminal acts, and would make criminals serve appropriate sentences, the criminal justice system could be a lot smaller, and consume much fewer resources trying the same criminals over and over and over again.


13 posted on 03/12/2012 4:25:10 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MetaThought

Public Defenderes tried that before...a number of criminals were up on relatively minor charges, the defenders wanted them to go to trial and jam up the works...One of the first up decided to plead out and the judge gave him time already served and let him go...the rest jumped on board and plead out also...


14 posted on 03/12/2012 4:26:25 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce

The Occupy Wall Street freeloaders are going to tear this country down.

Why doesn’t anyone care? :(

They will care WTSHTF and the OWS SH!Theads and Obozo’s free sh!t army hit the streets wanting what is “Theirs”. Except within 300 or so yds of where I am at. Gonna get bloody but I have a big drainage ditch for their remains and a loader to bury them with. I haven’t forgotten the training!


15 posted on 03/12/2012 4:29:36 PM PDT by mongo141 (Revolution ver 2.0, just a matter of when, not a matter of if!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
Let’s see... if you go to trial rather than plea-bargaining, especially if you might be found guilty, don’t you risk a higher penalty? Isn’t this essentially what the game theory people call “the prisoner’s dilemma?

Yes, the vast majority of these people are arrested for very good reason and accept a deal to reduce the odds of worse punishment with a jury trial.

Criminals all over the country are not going to unite to "crash the justice system". They couldn't care less about the system and only make these deals to save their own hides from a longer spell in jail/prison.

16 posted on 03/12/2012 4:30:28 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DirtyPigpen
I always thought it would be fun to see what would happen if eveyone when to the foodstamp office, welfare and all the other “free stuff” offices and applied, even if we did not need it.

You have a right to a speedy trial, but not to speedy welfare. So you'd spend your time in line, and be denied, and the govt. employee who makes the determination would still get their check. What's the point, unless your time is worth less than that of the avg. welfare recipient and you're willing to waste yours to waste theirs?

On the other hand, people denied their right to a speedy trial can have their convictions overturned and indictments thrown out...

17 posted on 03/12/2012 4:35:25 PM PDT by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: I cannot think of a name

Of those who take a plea deal, They take the deal because the prosecutor has them dead to rights, and a trail would get them significantly more prison time.

There is always the chance of a acquittal, but those are some pretty long odds.


18 posted on 03/12/2012 4:36:42 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (Democrats...the party of Slavery, Segregation, Sodomy, and Sedition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
'Criminals all over the country are not going to unite to "crash the justice system"'

Absurd. If ObamaCare is deemed 'Constitutional', this is a logical movement by a group of 'criminals' to fight back against the State. Anyone can be deemed a criminal by this organization called govt.

19 posted on 03/12/2012 4:37:27 PM PDT by Theoria (Rush Limbaugh: Ron Paul sounds like an Islamic terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MetaThought
Re: “Couldn’t we bring the whole system to a halt?”

There's actually a faster and lower risk way than demanding a jury trial.....

Keep your mouth shut.

Most of the people in jail either confessed to the police, or told easily checked lies to the police, or bragged to other criminals who testified against them, or talked to “trusted” friends or family who testified against them.

If a criminal has the self-discipline to continuously say, “I have no statement to make at this time,” his chance of staying out of jail instantly goes up to about 90%.

20 posted on 03/12/2012 4:37:43 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson