Charles, this looks really interesting, but I am going to save it till tomorrow and read it, I hope that’s okay. I didn’t want you to think I was ignoring you. I am off duty in 13 minutes... YAY!!
I don’t “care” if you respond or not. Please read if you like, but I’m not going to be upset if you don’t respond.
In some ways, I guess you proved the squeeky wheel gets the grease, because your repeated posting of this thing over and over, and insistance that people read it, got me to find out what the real story was.
I didn’t learn anything about Rick Santorum — as far as I can tell from the record, he simply acted as I’d expect a congressman to act given that the feds have to act like zoning board members when public land is being discussed.
But his perfunctory involvement in what in the end was a pedestrian case of an executive branch function wanting to overstep it’s bounds only holds interest for those who want to claim Santorum will be a president answering to the Vatican. I’ve read that enough that I find it both uninteresting and offensive, and in the end, I still feel that way after being made to slog through this case looking for some real evidence beyond the histrionics of Mother Jones and Daily Kos.