Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cost of refitting Royal Navy aircraft carrier trebles
The Daily Telegraph, UK ^ | 12 Mar 2012 | Thomas Harding, Defence Correspondent

Posted on 03/12/2012 9:24:59 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Cost of refitting Royal Navy aircraft carrier trebles

The costs of refitting a Royal Navy aircraft carrier so it can be used by a new generation of fighter jets have more than trebled, defence sources have told The Daily Telegraph.

Estimates for adapting HMS Prince of Wales so that it can be used by the Joint Strike Fighter are understood have risen from £500 million to £1.8 billion.

Millions have already been spent on studies to look at how to convert the ship after ministers decided to scrap the jump-jet variant of the plane in favour of a conventional take-off and landing model. But so great is the rise in total costs, ministers are considering abandoning the plan and reverting to the Ministry of Defence’s original proposals.

Philip Hammond, the Defence Secretary, believes there is not enough money in the budget to afford the £300 million a year to carry out the work over six years.

“We are certainly looking at what’s affordable and what can be done in terms of risk and cost,” said an MoD official. “If you have an unaffordable programme you cannot ignore it.” The move is likely to be embarrassing for the Government as the changes were at the heart of the Strategic Defence and Security Review in 2010. It will also heighten criticism of the Government for disbanding the fleet of Harrier jets and selling them to US Marine Corps for “peanuts”.

Under the new plans, the Government is expected to choose the jump-jet version of the JSF, even though the take-off and landing model can fly further and carry more bombs.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: aircraftcarrier; hmsprinceofwales; navair; royalnavy; uk

1 posted on 03/12/2012 9:25:11 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Under the new plans, the Government is expected to choose the jump-jet version of the JSF, even though the take-off and landing model can fly further and carry more bombs.

Ideally most aircraft should be take-off and landing models

2 posted on 03/12/2012 9:37:28 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Paparazzi mob senior citizen mistaking her for Lindsay Lohan (True Story))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: magslinger

ping


3 posted on 03/12/2012 10:27:04 PM PDT by Vroomfondel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Impressive.

Are those F-35’s?


4 posted on 03/12/2012 10:27:31 PM PDT by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Do they mean ‘’tripled’’?


5 posted on 03/12/2012 10:34:17 PM PDT by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/treble


6 posted on 03/12/2012 11:00:56 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: unkus

Yes-those are F-35B variants.


7 posted on 03/12/2012 11:07:43 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Thanks.


8 posted on 03/12/2012 11:16:46 PM PDT by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Vroomfondel; SC Swamp Fox; Fred Hayek; NY Attitude; P3_Acoustic; investigateworld; lowbuck; ...
SONOBUOY PING!

Photobucket

Click on pic for past Navair pings. Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist. The only requirement for inclusion in the Navair Pinglist is an interest in Naval Aviation. This is a medium to low volume pinglist.

9 posted on 03/13/2012 4:25:22 AM PDT by magslinger (If I wanted to vote for a Commie I would vote for Obammie. He has a chance of winning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa
Do they mean ‘’tripled’’?

Maybe the author is a fisherman fond of three pointed hooks.

10 posted on 03/13/2012 5:39:08 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
I ask again: Does anybody know if the F-35C is capable of STOBAR operations?

The conversion of the first carrier would be much less costly if only arrestor gear were to be retrofitted, skipping the EMALS.

11 posted on 03/13/2012 5:42:04 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

I know it’s confusing - it’s British English ;-) Trebled = tripled.


12 posted on 03/13/2012 7:38:57 AM PDT by fremont_steve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fremont_steve

Yeah right? We go to the ‘’bathroom’’ they go to the ‘’loo’’.


13 posted on 03/13/2012 10:43:25 AM PDT by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa
At least they don't make you go to the “toilette”.
14 posted on 03/13/2012 2:05:07 PM PDT by ravager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa
At least they don't make you go to the “toilette”.
15 posted on 03/13/2012 2:05:20 PM PDT by ravager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Two islands, yet ONE elevator? What’s wong with this picture..


16 posted on 03/14/2012 11:38:12 AM PDT by ken5050 (The ONLY reason to support Mitt: The Mormon Tabernacle Choir will appear at the WH each Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Two islands, yet ONE elevator? What’s wong with this picture..

Your interpretation. two lifts. #1 (shown at hangar deck level) abaft of foward island. #2 (shown at flight deck level) abaft of aft island.

Why two islands? Allows widely separated engine rooms with short intake/exhaust ducting. Also allows ship control from forward position, aircraft landing control from aft position. (Just an observation but it looks like Shiphandling of a Ford is gonna be a bitch)

17 posted on 07/11/2012 1:11:17 AM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Literals will believe anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
Thanks...I now see the second elevator outlined..and your comments about why two islands makes sense.

I wonder if the design includes fully rotatable bow and stern thrusters to make maneuvering easier. These are common now on all cruise liners. It's really amazing now to see a 1000ft, 100,000 ton liner docking in a small harbor without a single tugboat..

18 posted on 07/11/2012 10:07:07 AM PDT by ken5050 ("One useless man is a shame, two are a law firm, three are a Congress".....John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson