Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Scotswife
According to the article, the school feels justified in their actions because they obtained parental permission. If so, this is a tough case for the ACLU.

On one hand, I don't like the idea of on-line nazis. On the other, if the parents are going along with it, I can't cheer for the ACLU overruling the parents in a matter concerning their underage children.

On yet another hand, I really can't see anything that the kid posted on-line which would merit to this level of action. When I was that age, kids vented by passing notes, drawing cartoons and playground gossip using words and images more provocative than what this kid apparently posted on-line.

If caught, we might have our notes or cartoons confiscated or, if it was really serious, earn a trip to the principal or detention.

42 posted on 03/13/2012 6:43:17 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Vigilanteman

The kids are even nastier now.
They don’t get a break.
We used to go home, even after a tough day, and got a breather.

Now...they are on the phones, on the computer - and if you’re getting bullied it can be non-stop.

Parents have to step in to...and I’m sure most concerned parents do their best.

However...there is a certain group that shows up that school and says...”how could you not know this was happening!!”

As if teacher and principals are supposed to spend their off-hours monitoring the online conversations.

It’s a little bizarre.


44 posted on 03/13/2012 6:51:57 AM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson