Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney,Santorum to Call for English Language Requirement in Discussion of Puerto Rico Statehood
Syscon Media ^ | 031312 | marketwire

Posted on 03/13/2012 12:06:04 PM PDT by Fred

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: cripplecreek; Fred

Maybe both of you could stick to promoting your guy instead of trying to eviscerate the other conservative candidate.


21 posted on 03/13/2012 12:45:52 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: freeangel
Good question. But its a moot point anyway. Why would Puerto Rico vote for statehood (buy a cow) when they get milk (almost all the privileges of statehood) for free?
22 posted on 03/13/2012 12:47:37 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

I don’t post attack threads.


23 posted on 03/13/2012 12:49:28 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Fred
Actually, Santorum and Romney both have better records on immigration issues than Newt Gingrich. I think that is what is driving this.
24 posted on 03/13/2012 12:51:10 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Ah, so your ripping into Newt is so much more righteous, then.

I'm sorry, but both Santorum and Newt have flaws. And both have considerable strengths. And both are vastly better than Romney, RuPaul and Obama.

I'm sitting here in PA. For once, my primary vote is going to matter for the GOP nomination. Make the case who I should vote for, because last I checked, there is no space on the ballot for who to vote against.

25 posted on 03/13/2012 12:52:52 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy; cripplecreek; Fred
Maybe both of you could stick to promoting your guy instead of trying to eviscerate the other conservative candidate.

Amen!

Neither Newt or Rick is the enemy.

Focus you're fire on Mitt, he must be defeated.

We lose with Mitt, we win with either Newt or Rick.
26 posted on 03/13/2012 1:07:01 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Ah, so your ripping into Newt is so much more righteous, then.

Show me a single thread that I posted attacking Gingrich unprovoked. In fact, you won't find many that any santorum supporter has posted for the express purpose of attacking gingrich. Now if you would like you can spend the next couple of days you can go back and look at all the pure Santorum attack threads. I guarantee you'll find at least 10 of them today.

You can feel superior about being above it all but don't expect Santorum supporters to sit back and take this endless beating from a couple of idiots who can't pass by a single thread. In fact, if you look, you'll find that they themselves insert themselves into the Santorum threads.
27 posted on 03/13/2012 1:07:01 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

And I am asking what is gained in defending Santorum by bashing Newt. Seriously, the circular firing squad is as bad as I have seen here in a primary - and between two candidates who are the only remaining options against Romney. How about stating that both candidates have flaws, here is why I think my guy is better, and telling the Santorum-bashers if they want to do Romeny’s dirty work for free that speaks far more about them than it does Santorum.


28 posted on 03/13/2012 1:12:01 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
And I am asking what is gained in defending Santorum by bashing Newt. Seriously, the circular firing squad is as bad as I have seen here in a primary

Nothing circular about it. Any Honest person can see that Santorum attack threads are steadily posted here. Gingrich attack threads, not so much.
29 posted on 03/13/2012 1:17:03 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I see plenty of bashing all around, and it is getting worse with each passing week. I just don’t think that returning fire in kind is productive towards promoting conservatism.


30 posted on 03/13/2012 1:20:14 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Well I can guarantee that you won’t see me bashing Newt until one of his supporters chooses to post their endless attacks. Period.


31 posted on 03/13/2012 1:28:07 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

First PR does not WANT to be a state. That also gives them representatives in Congress and more electoral votes—all Democrat, of course. Republicans should be saying that PR doesn’t want it!!! Better still, shut up about it. If they get statehood Washington DC will want it too and charge discrimination


32 posted on 03/13/2012 1:45:26 PM PDT by RightLady (Liberty above all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fred
Romney supports Puerto Rico statehood?

(1) Two new Democrat senators.

(2) Five new Democrat congress people (3.7 million population).

(3) Seven electoral votes for Democrat presidential nominee.

(4) Puerto Rico GDP per capita - $20,000

(5) USA GDP per capita - $48,000

33 posted on 03/13/2012 1:59:54 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
I've always thought that statehood for PR would be a bad idea...if they get dissatisfied with their present status they should become independent. If they became a state, it would be after a slim majority voted for it--what if twenty years later they all wanted independence? Would they be allowed to secede because they are Hispanic (the Confederate States were denied that option but they were mostly white Protestants--at least those who had any political voice were)?

If statehood becomes inevitable, they shouldn't be a 51st state but should be added to Vermont, so the Democrats don't get two more senators. If the Vermonters don't like it, accuse them of racism to shut them up.

34 posted on 03/13/2012 6:14:02 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson