Posted on 03/14/2012 11:49:30 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Romney is the LOSER who lost to the LOSER McLame, who LOST TO OBAMA!!
Why on earth would we want to run the 2nd place guy from last time, when the first place guy from last time couldn't beat Obama
Obama is like a little girl playing president.
Wrong.
Doesn’t matter. If Newt and Rick stay in then Romney is still only placing and this thing goes to the floor.
Me too Antonius.
No nose holding anymore. This is about principle and integrity. I wouldn’t be able to look myself in the mirror if I compromised my core Conservative values by voting for this despicable man.
and if Rom were to be the nominee(which I don’t think he will), it won’t be because of us(like my Elite GOP friend said).
It’ll be due to the stupid, out of touch GOP-E trying to force a candidate like Mittens down our throats...and the stupid sheeple who vote for him as a result.
If I hear one more pundit say that we Conservatives will “come around”.... Not this Conservative. Thanks anyway!
Zactly!!
That’s what I keep trying to splain. At convention Newt and Rick’s delegates will outnumber Mutt’s.
Hosepipe, you just hosed yourself and you’re all wet.
“With three in the race, mittens gets 1/3 of remaining delegates.
With two in the race, mittens gets 1/2 of remaining delegates.
... just sayin’...”
Plus Mittens (and his buddy Obama) gets to focus their fire on Santorum only if Newt gets out.
This is exactly what the GOP insiders want in a candidate. It's why they keep cramming losers like Romney and McCain down our throats, the idea being that in the general, the red states will fall in line (where else are they going to go?) and the moderate guy could maybe turn a few blues.
Of course, it never works out, given a choice between two liberals, the blue states always pick the one the MSM says isn't a meanie. You can't win in a "our lib is better than their lib" competition. We need to draw distinctions like "liberalism is the problem, conservatism is the solution and our guy is conservative" and let the voters decide. But subtle shades between the candidates ALWAYS favors the incumbent and it's why Romney is very unlikely to beat Obama IMHO.
Easy, He is not Mitt.
Well, since you said it, I guess that settles it. Glad to finally meet the man that knows everything.
I disagree. I think 75% of newt's go to mittens.
This foulness came from the left regarding Palin and Trig. He isn't using his little girl. She was a fact way before he ran, so was Trig.
You should be ashamed and it certainly hasn't won any brownie points for your candidate.
Santorum's victories are big. Newt has got to be depressed.
And those are places where Obama will crush Romney.
RE: Santorum’s victories are big. Newt has got to be depressed.
It is pretty clear now that Newt is REDEFINING victory as stopping Romney from getting 1,144 delegates, not winning the delegate count himself.
[ You should be ashamed and it certainly hasn’t won any brownie points for your candidate. ]
WHY?.. Santo hasn’t got anything else.. except for human interest storys..
Santo is owned by the UNIONS.. as is Willard and Zero..
ONLY Newt has a plan.. WIllard and Santo are merely composed of platitudes..]
ONLY Newt will disassemble the federal gov’t... not just Washington D.C...
It Will take mean wiley courageous SOB to fix America at this stage..
Santo and WIllard are just plain old family men.. probably RINGERS.. Shills.. Kabuki actors..
No Newt.... NO WIN...
[ Hosepipe, you just hosed yourself and you’re all wet. ]
Santo and Willard are indeed OWNED BY THE UNIONS....
WHO came out against Walker in Wisconsin?...
It was the Police, Firefighters and the Teachers... and other State funded parasites..
If YOU are a Union member then YOU ARE SUSPECT to being a socialist..
Therefore up to sedition and probably treason.. at least an enabler of it..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.