Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Cracks Down On Medical Marijuana [even in states where it's legal]
NPR ^ | July 12, 2011 | Carrie Johnson

Posted on 03/14/2012 5:16:56 PM PDT by grundle

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: grundle

The only reason this Administration would oppose it would be to position a drug cartel so they have more control over the entire distribution market.


21 posted on 03/14/2012 6:34:42 PM PDT by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

Obama’s a cokehead.


22 posted on 03/14/2012 6:36:55 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stilloftyhenight
Good for your daughter. Most people on this site are extremely ignorant about medical marijuana. The fact that Obama would be against medical marijuana makes perfect sense to me.
23 posted on 03/14/2012 6:38:55 PM PDT by TBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: When do we get liberated?

There are any number of medicinal purposes for Whiskey - it is commonly refeered to as the “sovereign specific”, the aid for what ails you.

This is not a joke - alchohol is used in medicine for all kinds of things.

From cough syrup to antiseptics, to anesthesia, ...


24 posted on 03/14/2012 6:40:31 PM PDT by patton (DateDiff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: grundle; All

This from a dope smokin/Coke snortin TOTUS? I’ll bet he has a stash of both : )


25 posted on 03/14/2012 7:06:12 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
He’s doing it for donations from drug dealers for protecting their profits.

You might be on to something. Obama was also fond of running guns to the narco-terrorists.
26 posted on 03/14/2012 7:24:01 PM PDT by PA Engineer (Time to beat the swords of government tyranny into the plowshares of freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TBall

Thankyou for that kind reply.

She was excelling, recognized by her profs and doors opened for her because of it. She would have been one of the best in Neurology. She worked so hard to get there and was crushed at having to leave school. I lovingly call her “my pothead daughter.” I am thankful that she has finally found relief. Those who mock have no idea what they’re talking about. (Or they are perhaps heavily invested in Big Pharma stocks.) It was a godsend.


27 posted on 03/14/2012 8:04:58 PM PDT by stilloftyhenight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Husker24

>>>This isn’t going to win him any votes, I don’t understand it. There must be some political reason for it.<<<

Yes, there is a political reason for it.

It helps the Obama administration to have the people’s emotions and thoughts focused on minor issues that inflame the passions - contraceptives, racial division, smoking weed. While the masses are arguing with each other and divided over relatively small matters, the party can focus on consolidating power and control.

The people who want to vote for Obama probably already will, and those who smoke weed already don’t care about the drug laws. In fact, keeping weed legal assists the Democratic party project of tearing down the country by making rule of law seem petty and pathetic.

Back in my youth I was exposed to a lot of Marxist and Leninist philosophy in my political science classes. Misdirection and agitation propaganda are great tools for the control of the masses. In the meantime, Obama has explicitly made recess appointments when the Senate was in session, had his subordinates tell Congress that they’ll qualify decisions of war based on international approval, ruled without a budget for more than four years... and that’s just off the top of my head. Expect more to come.

God help us.


28 posted on 03/14/2012 8:12:42 PM PDT by redpoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: redpoll

Meant to write “keeping weed illegal.”


29 posted on 03/14/2012 8:14:17 PM PDT by redpoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
At some point in time, more important matters will demand attention. Don’t hold your breath, however.

Thirty years ago that was exactly what I believed. If "matters" get any more important no one is going to care what is legal or illegal. Not pot not murder not anything.

30 posted on 03/14/2012 11:00:17 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: stilloftyhenight
Big Pharma. We have to keep taking their toxic drugs that cost a fortune and create other medical problems.

Big Pharma is not the problem. Big Gov, and its horde of bureaucrats who would be out of work, are the problem. For example, the main opposition to California's effort to legalize marijuana came from police organizations. As far as I can tell, Big Pharma stayed out of it. See URL below.

http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Measures/Detail.aspx?id=1321713&session=2009

31 posted on 03/14/2012 11:09:00 PM PDT by Ken H (Austerity is the irresistible force. Entitlements are the immovable object.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%

Perhaps but he’s got the eyes of a stoner.


32 posted on 03/15/2012 4:09:43 AM PDT by the invisib1e hand (knowledge puffeth; information deludeth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: grundle
Walters said. "They're getting the marijuana from some of the same criminal mafias in Mexico that are killing people daily."

And the only reason that criminals are the source of marijuana is that lying filth like John Walters have fought mightily to keep marijuana illegal.

33 posted on 03/15/2012 11:56:57 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: When do we get liberated?
I will give a damn about that when they find the medicinal purpose for whiskey.

During prohibition, doctors could, and did, prescribe ethyl alcohol for their patients.

But, like prohibition, the WosD is really about expanding the size and scope of the government than about the health and well-being of the citizenry.

34 posted on 03/15/2012 5:07:37 PM PDT by Ol' Dan Tucker (People should not be afraid of the government. Government should be afraid of the people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies

And of course, if we simply legalize pot, all pot-related crime will go away?

No, it won’t.

The reason?

People deal in pot (and all drugs) illegally not because pot is illegal, but because those people are first-and-foremost criminals. They choose crime because of the high-risk:high-profit ratio.

If you legalize pot, guess what. They will still deal pot illegally for the profit. Why? Because they are criminals.

Legalizing drugs will not eliminate drug-related crime. There will always be a black market for cheaper drugs or those that are still illegal.


35 posted on 03/15/2012 6:13:11 PM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival. (Ron Paul is the Lyndon Larouche of the 21st century.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe
People deal in pot (and all drugs) illegally not because pot is illegal, but because those people are first-and-foremost criminals. They choose crime because of the high-risk:high-profit ratio.

If you legalize pot, guess what. They will still deal pot illegally for the profit.

Like the mob still deals alcohol illegally? LOL!

36 posted on 03/16/2012 2:48:55 PM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies

Yeah, there is no criminal sales of alcohol in the US.

LOL!!


37 posted on 03/16/2012 5:31:58 PM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival. (Ron Paul is the Lyndon Larouche of the 21st century.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe
Not at a level that profits criminals to any significant degree.
38 posted on 03/16/2012 9:18:10 PM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson