Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: katiedidit1

Something’s fuzzy here alright

You said “Sanctimonious should take one for the conservative team and drop out”

Isn’t that calling to “disenfranchise” those of us who want to vote for “Sanctimonious”?

especially when “Sanctimonious” has won more primaries with more votes and gained more delegates than Newt?

As far as fuzzy math (and other fuzzy thinking)- are you counting Romney as part of “the conservative team”?


49 posted on 03/15/2012 9:46:21 AM PDT by silverleaf (Funny how all the people who are for abortion are already born)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: silverleaf

Your math on Santorum winning everything is absolutely fuzzy. You want to disenfranchise the Newt supporters so turn about is fair play.
Obama would love Newt to drop out but even if he did..his supporters are not going to all rally around Santorum.
We are half way through the states...noone should drop out. Let Newt make his case and rattle the establishment. Obama has already gone after Newt over gasoline prices and more..he doesnt bother with Santorum.
Newt has a vendetta against Romney and I don’t blame him. He is continuing to introduce his ideas and solutions. I like what Newt is saying...I dont like what RS has done or is saying.
However, since Santorum loves to take one for the team...he should get out and support Newt. Rally around the true conservative


50 posted on 03/15/2012 9:55:30 AM PDT by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson