let’s do a thought experiment. You assume this is “state business and “for the children.”
Does that mean you have a bullet proof suit that will protect you from a teen causing you to wreck on an interstate highway that you might drive on?
Or do you think that in a wreck, only the folks in the drivers’ car are at risk of death or injury. Or maybe you only drive on state roads.
Like I said, this bill is not great by me, but I reject the notion that it is nanny statism the way many other pieces of legislation are.
Don’t like it, I suggest you get your state legislator to pass a bill similar to this one. I would also suggest if a state doesn’t have a law against it, don’t drive in that state. That is where this issues belong.
I agree with you. Texting while driving is stupid and very dangerous to anyone on any road. It should be outlawed everywhere, enforced and punished with loss of license. This is one instance where a uniform national policy would be a good thing. Where ever you find yourself in the USA you will lose your license if you are caught texting while driving. Enforce that for 6 monthes and it would no longer be a problem.
That is the way these things work. There is no violation of the Tenth Amendment per se. However, the legislation would further diminish the abilities of the states to adopt their own requirements, suited to them, in favor of a one size fits all policy.
I respect Colonel West and, given an opportunity, would vote for him for President enthusiastically. However, I think he got stuck in a trap here. He should change his mind and so state.