Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fracking did not pollute water near homes: U.S. (Dimmock, PA)
MSNBC ^ | 15 March 2011 | Reuters

Posted on 03/16/2012 7:32:03 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi

WASHINGTON — A first round of tests showed no evidence that water at 11 homes in a small town in Pennsylvania near natural gas drilling operations had been polluted to unhealthy levels, U.S. environmental regulators said on Thursday.

The Environmental Protection Agency said in January it would perform tests at about 60 homes in Dimock where residents have complained since 2008 of cloudy, foul-smelling water after Cabot Oil & Gas Corp began hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, for gas nearby.

Sampling results from the first round of 11 homes "did not show levels of contamination that could present a health concern," a regional EPA spokesman said in an email.

Samples from six of the 11 homes did show concentrations of sodium, methane, chromium or bacteria, but those results were all within safe ranges, the spokesman said.

Arsenic was found in the water at two of the 11 homes, but the agency determined those levels were also safe. The agency will retest the water at those two homes.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: environment; epa; fracking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
What is the first reaction from the environmentalists?

The EPA has been bought off by the oil industry.

There is not enough evidence to prove environmentalists are wrong.

It's almost like they bitterly cling to their religion.......

1 posted on 03/16/2012 7:32:09 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

Well, hey, as long as it’s a safe level of pollution, all is well.


2 posted on 03/16/2012 7:35:10 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

This story was reported by our local news last night.

It was near impossible to find through searches online.....and I can find nearly anything.


3 posted on 03/16/2012 7:35:18 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (When religions have to beg the gov't for a waiver, we are already under socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Well, hey, as long as it’s a safe level of pollution, all is well.

There's no such thing as pure well water. Mine has "detectable" levels of mercury in it.
4 posted on 03/16/2012 7:44:18 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Well, hey, as long as it’s a safe level of pollution, all is well.

Uneducated and ignorant post of the week candidate!

5 posted on 03/16/2012 7:44:21 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (When religions have to beg the gov't for a waiver, we are already under socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

People in my area are in a growing state of panic due to the anti drilling activists. A woman at a recent meeting was screaming about all the chemicals detected in her well that “weren’t there” 20 years ago.

However, the numbers she gave from the two tests 20 years apart told the whole story. 20 years ago, the test couldn’t detect what they find in miniscule quantities today.


6 posted on 03/16/2012 7:50:47 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

“Well, hey, as long as it’s a safe level of pollution, all is well.”

Well, I think Wolfie is just poking fun, and is, well, just being facetious as well.


7 posted on 03/16/2012 7:55:41 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

This is old news because two years ago the state determined there was no contamination from gas wells at Dimock:

DEP CONTINUES TO ANALYZE DIMOCK WATER SUPPLIES
No Indications of Contamination from Gas Well Hydro Fracturing Activities

WILKES-BARRE – Responding to recent concerns expressed by residents of Dimock Township, Susquehanna County, the Department of Environmental Protection has collected dozens of water supply samples in the Carter Road area and determined that nearby gas well hydro fracturing activity has not impacted local wells.

http://www.portal.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt/community/newsroom/14287?id=2165&typeid=1


8 posted on 03/16/2012 8:05:12 AM PDT by epithermal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
The article did not mention if the pollutants that were measured, had the “fingerprint” so to speak of any fracing chemicals used or the local hydrocarbons in this local Pennsylvania zone. This is an added level of information that would refute/confirm to a higher confidence level the effect, if any, of the the fracing operation on the local drinking water from wells. In addition, the article did not state if the pollutants measured (below actionable concentrations per the article) were typical background in composition and concentration for the region or not.

It was mentioned that a previous study in Wyoming did verify that specific fracing chemicals were not in local drinking water wells, which implies that chemical fingerprints were part of the analytical data and its interpretation.

9 posted on 03/16/2012 8:06:16 AM PDT by Hootowl99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
20 years ago, the test couldn’t detect what they find in miniscule quantities today.

Which is the whole basis of today's environmental lunacy:

"If we can detect it, it must be bad, and therefore, banned."
10 posted on 03/16/2012 8:08:28 AM PDT by BikerJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

But the facts don’t matter. There is a movie which says that it did. And it is endorsed by Troy Polamalu.


11 posted on 03/16/2012 8:08:33 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

A little bit of both. Make no mistake, I’m on the side of the industry on this point. Presumably, the residents did notice a change in their water (cloudier and smellier), but if tests prove levels are safe, then it’s small price for them to pay for our energy needs. The idea that we’re going to have pristine water and air was nice, but we live in a global economy now, where our competitors citizens don’t or can’t demand that. To compete with that, quality of life has to be adjusted. Of course, it’s not my water, but there ya go.


12 posted on 03/16/2012 8:09:35 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
Well, hey, as long as it’s a safe level of pollution, all is well.

Believe it or not, there are even safe levels of ,"gasp", radiation!
13 posted on 03/16/2012 8:10:43 AM PDT by BikerJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Our well water smells kinda off after we have a lot of run off from heavy rains. We're about 60' above the Mississippi and only a 100 yrds from the riverbank. A decent water softener and a couple of judiciously places filters and our water tastes better than Evian.

The prices on whole house filters has really come down while the efficiencies of these units has gone up.

"Drill baby, drill..."

14 posted on 03/16/2012 8:17:45 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Steampunk- Yesterday's Tomorrow, Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
People in my area are in a growing state of panic due to the anti drilling activists. A woman at a recent meeting was screaming about all the chemicals detected in her well that “weren’t there” 20 years ago.

That is why the Impact Fee legislation establishes mandatory baseline water quality levels for private wells near drilling sites.

15 posted on 03/16/2012 8:19:02 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (When religions have to beg the gov't for a waiver, we are already under socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Fracking has nothing to do with it.

If they did notice a difference in their water it was from the increase in the number of water wells removing the water from the ground. As you take the water out more water comes in to replace it and as it does it brings the so called “bad things” with it.

16 posted on 03/16/2012 8:25:09 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350

Another possibility, as the water level goes down the concentration of “bad things” goes up.


17 posted on 03/16/2012 8:31:46 AM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: moehoward

You’re right.

As the water table drops or the more the water moves the more contaminants will be in the water.


18 posted on 03/16/2012 8:38:12 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
People in my area are in a growing state of panic due to the anti drilling activists. A woman at a recent meeting was screaming about all the chemicals detected in her well that “weren’t there” 20 years ago.

I was horrified to hear the the wells were full of Dihydrogen Monoxide......that stuff can kill you!

19 posted on 03/16/2012 8:40:02 AM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

I’ve been the operator of a small public water supply for almost 30 years. We have four deep wells. There’s “stuff” in the water. Heck, there’s “stuff” in surface water supplies. It can’t all be removed, and it’s there naturally. But the amounts are infinitesimal! Fractions of a part per billion. And, they’re very strictly regulated by the epa. Water is different everywhere, depending on what the water is exposed to. Well water generally has more minerals present, surface water, more chemical agents. I can remember drinking from a water fountain in Midland Texas 50 years ago. Water tasted like metal! Like chompin’ on a penny. If we had to remove every trace of everything, there’s no way you could afford to use water! Back to a once a month bath, where the whole family shares the same bath water. And back to outhouses!
20 years ago, a rep from the epa (spit,,spit) told me they felt a fair water bill for a family of four should be $1,500 per year! And that was then! Wonder what they think is fair now?
BTW, our water has always passed all their tests with flying colors, but there’s still “stuff” in the water. Just not enough to remotely matter.


20 posted on 03/16/2012 8:50:29 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson