Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nachum

But when you read the actual transcript, it turns out that the allegations are quite different from the portrayal by Olbermann and Shuster. According to the transcript, we learn that after O’Keefe had left, Naffe decided she wanted to leave, and insisted that O’Keefe return to the barn. She claimed to be feeling sick, which she suspected was from the alcohol she had drunk: “I thought the alcohol had made me sick.” Apparently not suspecting O’Keefe of having done anything wrong, she tried to get him to come back to the barn. He initially refused:

But he refused to come back to the barn. He said that all he cared about was his project. He insisted that I spend the night there and that we take the matter up in the morning. He wanted to go shoot videos the next day.

http://patterico.com/2012/02/28/exclusive-transcript-of-nadia-naffes-testimony-against-james-okeefe/


66 posted on 03/16/2012 6:00:55 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kcvl

No matter what the the truth is, they are going to “Fluke” O’Keefe. They are going to go after him and try and get media to boycott his stories and use this to discredit anything he does.

You can see it coming from a mile away. It won’t work, but they are going after every truth-teller the conservatives have. Like I said- it beats a heart attack.


69 posted on 03/16/2012 6:18:36 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: kcvl
Right. The story fits a classic line. He came there to work. She apparently was or became inebriated. An altercation ensued and he left saying we'll have to take this up in the morning after you sober up. She, possibly, drunk called him later and begged him to come back. He rejected returning to the barn to be with her in that condition. She say, well then, I want to go home. He says, you are too drunk to leave now, just stay there until morning and then we can talk.

They waited for her to ‘calm down’, aka pass-out, threw her in the car and dumped her at the train station. It is the classic drunk girl ditch. It happens all the time. What is the big deal, that her panties were missing from her luggage?

Ok. Let's look at this. Obviously this is intended to imply some sort of sexual motivation. I guess. So James and his friend have a passed out girl in the car, and suddenly they regress to 15 year olds and want to see her panties. So one of them says, hey! I think I saw some panties in her luggage. Yeah, let's get them. Yeah, she'll wake up and she'll be all like, Where are my panties? And we'll be all like, I don't know. It'll be Great man! By the way, dude, why don't we just take the panties off of her? No way dude! That would be sick. I'm not a pervo, dude.

Ummm, Ok. Which one of these two seems more likely? What is even the issue here? Wow. America has gone insane.

Ok.

70 posted on 03/16/2012 6:28:09 PM PDT by 240B (he is doing everything he said he wouldn't and not doing what he said he would)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson