Posted on 03/16/2012 8:35:09 PM PDT by STARWISE
The administration this afternoon released its “Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on preventive services policy.”
Translation: President Barack Obama and HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius are moving forward with their controversial contraception mandate, which requires even religiously affiliated employers to provide their employees with insurance that covers contraception — even if those employers object to contraception on religious grounds.
But don’t worry: Secretary Sebelius says your religious liberty is assured, so it is assured.
“The President’s policy respects religious liberty and makes free preventive services available to women,” she said. ”Today’s announcement is the next step toward fulfilling that commitment.”
Never mind that, by drawing a distinction between actual churches and church-operated businesses like hospitals and schools, the administration effectively appropriated for itself the power to determine what constitutes ministry. Also, last I checked, there was no such thing as “free preventive services.”
Sandra Fluke should be happy, though. The administration made a final decision about whether it will require colleges to provide students with insurance that covers contraception, as well. Take one wild guess as to what their decision was. Yep, that’s right:
*** Administration officials also released a final rule governing student health plans. Under the final rule, students will gain the same consumer protections other people with individual market insurance have, like a prohibition on lifetime limits and coverage of preventive services without cost sharing.
In the same way that religious colleges and universities will not have to pay, arrange or refer for contraceptive coverage for their employees, they will not have to do so for their students who will get such coverage directly and separately from their insurer. ***
Note that the administration still pretends the mandate isn’t a mandate on religious employers if the insurers have to provide contraception coverage “directly and separately” to employees and students.
Actually, it’s still a conscience-violating mandate, as Ed explained when the administration first announced its “accommodation”:
*** So these employers will still have to provide the health insurance, and the health insurance must cover the contraception and abortifacients. The White House apparently wants to pretend that the funds for these outlays will come off of the Unobtanium Tree, where insurers find money to cover all mandates.
This exposes once again a stunning ignorance of risk pools and how costs are passed along to consumers.
Let’s just take this one step at a time. Where do insurers get money to pay claims? They collect premiums and co-pays from the insured group or risk pool.
No matter what the Obama administration wants to say now, the money that will cover those contraception costs will come from the religious organizations that must now by law buy that insurance and pay those premiums.
Their religious doctrines have long-standing prohibitions against participating in contraception and abortion, and nothing in this “accommodation” changes the fact that the government is now forcing them to both fund and facilitate access to products and services that offend their practice of religion.
Basically, the Obama administration told religious organizations to stop complaining and get in line. This “accommodation” only attempts to accommodate Obama’s political standing and nothing more. ***
Consider also that many religious employers are self-insured and have no insurer onto whom they can push the cost of contraception insurance.
The timing of this announcement just couldn’t have been better. As The Washington Examiner’s Joel Gehrke put it, “The announcement came late Friday afternoon, on the eve of St. Patrick’s Day, as the second day of March Madness basketball games were under way.” People skip work to watch March Madness.
Think they’re going to turn off the TV to dig up a dry statement from Her Consistency Kathleen Sebelius? Not likely.
Half of this site seems perfectly fine w him getting a second term if their dreamboat does not get. Te nod.
I wouldn't call it "anger," that's your word. I'd call it something else, though, and it isn't misplaced.
The post you're quoting from, “Half of this site seems...” is #81.
Whatever your point is, it's of no interest to me. My original post was not addressed to you. Take your anger and peddle it somewhere else. We have more important work to do here at FreeRepublic.
0bama will ignore any SCOTUS ruling against him on mandates or 0bamacare. He (and Eric Holder) are currently ignoring the prior SCOTUS ruling authorizing Voter ID requirements to the States.
Just like we had to pass ObamaCare in the first place without reading it?
Grrr.
If it’s Romney - I can’t go with the GOP.
If the GOP is bent on electing the architect of Mittcare in Massachusetts then they’ll do so without me. If they are so bent on promoting slavery then we will have to let them have their slavery and continue to defend the liberty of the American people.
There are some principles that are non-negotiable and Romney has already crossed that line. Willingly. Why would we reward such perfidy by promoting him? You wouldn’t do that in business, so why here?
This is the time to stand up people. First, the come for the Catholics, then who’s next? you can kiss religious freedom good bye if this goes through.
Close but in this case anyone who wants to can find out exactly how duplicitous Mutt is in about 30 minutes. No need to read 2,000 pages of legalese to figure him out.
By the authority that nobody has the balls (apparently) to stop him.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
Itssme has it right - it's tyranny and erosion or rather destruction of religious freedom in one blow.
marker
Unless the next President is Ron Paul, the next President will do very little to undo what Obama has done. Why do I say this? Look at their history. They talk a good game when it’s election time, but they all share Obama’s basic faith in a central, activist government. They might vary on the details of how it all should work, but they are agreed on the basic premise: we need government, government, government and more government.
Any government that can mandate that I pay for someone else’s birth control services can also mandate castration and tube snipping.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.