Agreed. I still question why pass a federal law if we’re not going to enforce it.
Santorum is correct in that this is an issue that hurts this country. It starts out as a personal issue, but eventually becomes an economic one, as families are torn apart.
Again, I say, it will be up to Santorum on how effectively he deals with this issue as a presidential candidate. He has to get elected first. But how different it is that people are actually discussing the moral fiber (or the decline of it) of this country and its effect on the family, economics, etc. It’s simply amazing what is considered unpolitic in current elections.
I think there is some common ground. It is an issue that people care about and it is worth discussing. And I dont have a problem with a President saying he thinks “x” activity is harmful. It just seems to be a fine line from saying x is harmful to Congress banning x.
Sadly, it appears fewer and fewer conservatives understand the nexus between the two.
There's not a single member of Fr who is saying morality isn't important.....it's a matter of the very fact the country is going into free fall and is in dangerous perils financially, being taken over by commie ntcases and their agenda ...which IS the priority
Obama is setting up for religious and morality wars because he doesn't have a leg to stand on otherwise....and Santorum's taking the bait all to well...and why the Democrats love that Santorum's at the top of the heat.
Go to most Democratic sights and see what they are saying about Santorum.....they are delighted he's galvanizing their otherwise couch potatoes into action.
People have been discussing the moral fiber of this country for years...it's not like it's something new. But that is what Santorum is known for. Little other can he maneuver where he isn't sounding like he "borrowed" from others....and does on a consistent.