This case seems pretty cut-and-dry: An armed man follows and confronts an unarmed teen and then shoots and kills him. Everyone should be outraged. This appears to be one of those stories in which the family and their supporters are justified in their outrage.
>>This case seems pretty cut-and-dry: An armed man follows and confronts an unarmed teen and then shoots and kills him. Everyone should be outraged. This appears to be one of those stories in which the family and their supporters are justified in their outrage.<<
You are exactly correct. Remove “black kid” and the shooter is a murderer. Some people have no business to have CC. This guy got his license and was looking to use it.
Yep - too many are too eager to jump on the side of the person exercising his 2nd Amendment rights and turn a blind eye to the small percentage that turn out to be bad apples. We all want to believe that it has to be a hit piece,because of the fear that the minute percentage of those who carry guns and do bad will give the Left reason to take them away. All they need to do is remember Charlton Heston's remark, while holding a rifle above his head, "...from my cold dead hands".
This does not even appear to be an over-zealous citizen making an arrest after witnessing a crime. It APPEARS only one crime was committed. Even if the kid pulled a knife on the street to protect himself against another armed man, the deceased appears to be a murder victim.
agree
You left out an important step. You said "confronts...and then shoots" yet all accounts state that there was some sort of physical fight before the shooting. Why did you leave out the fight? Are you deliberately lying in service to some agenda?
I think there’s more to this - isn’t the ‘teenager’ a criminal?