Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trisham; gogogodzilla

Seeing as the right to life was actually mentioned in our founding documents, I think that’s more than enough prerogative to consider abortion a federal issue. You would always have the issue of people crossing state lines to do it, which would make any particular state law ineffectual. If it took a constitutional amendment, that’s fine.

And in the case of marriage, it’s just stopping the government from being involved. If two same-sex people, or three, or four, want to claim they’ve been married, that’s up to them, but there shouldn’t be any government recognition of it. And marriage/divorce/custody is far too legally complicated an issue to have different rules set up in different states.


97 posted on 03/19/2012 4:25:18 PM PDT by JediJones (The Divided States of Obama's Declaration of Dependence: Death, Taxes and the Pursuit of Crappiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: JediJones
We have fallen so far away from the Constitution. Our Founding Fathers would weep.

"Posterity! you will never know how much it cost the present generation to preserve your freedom! I hope you will make a good use of it. If you do not, I shall repent in Heaven that I ever took half the pains to preserve it. "

~John Adams


99 posted on 03/19/2012 4:29:48 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

To: JediJones

I agree. (Though it will need to take an amendment for abortion.)


104 posted on 03/19/2012 6:21:22 PM PDT by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson