To: dead
Santorum is right. Freedom is the issue. In recent months I have been a Santorum supporter, although I have now switched to Gingrich.
I'm certainly not a defender of pornography.
But if people want freedom, then they probably have to accept the fact that a whole lot of people want porn. Santorum seems to not really value freedom as a principle. He wants certain outcomes, and he seems willing to sacrifice freedom in order to attain his goals.
59 posted on
03/19/2012 7:45:56 PM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
("And the public gets what the public wants" -- The Jam)
To: ClearCase_guy
Freedom for Porn because sire as shooting that's what our forefathers meant. That's what they sacrificed their precious honor to defend. Yep. They did it cause a whole lot of people want porn.
Why not just admit that you are a crazy unlce Paul supporter?
61 posted on
03/19/2012 7:50:46 PM PDT by
GulfBreeze
(Still a Santorum guy !)
To: ClearCase_guy
In this case, I was talking about economic liberty, since porn doesn't really affect the unemployment numbers. Other people brought up other issues on the thread.
Rick is wrong about porn. I mean he's wrong to have an official position at all. He's running for president and the pros and cons of porn are pretty damn irrelevant to the position.
62 posted on
03/19/2012 7:50:46 PM PDT by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson