Yes. You claimed he ran false ads against Newt at the same time as Romney, that made the same false claims as the Romney ads.
But you posted two truthful negative ads (factually — their opinions and conclusions are just that, and are not “true” or “false”) that were run AFTER Romney’s ads had already done their damage in Florida, two ads that were run in the next contests.
So, while they are certainly negative attack ads against Gingrich, they don’t really show either of your claims to be true. I don’t agree with the conclusion of the two ads you posted, btw. But they aren’t the same as the false attack ads Romney ran.
Meanwhile, I’m waiting for someone to explain to me how fighting over who ran what ads in January helps beat ROmney. And I’d REALLY like to know how freepers positively supporting Romney attacks against Santorum is helpful in beating Romney.
Baloney.
Neither is truthful.
Give me a break. Just support your failed priest and be happy with that moron.