Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spacejunkie2001

You are also jumping to conclusions. He did have problems with blacks. This has been established through complaints the HOA had about him. There was a racial epithet used by him during one of the 911 calls. There was no fight. The boy was on his back with a bag of skittles in his hand calling for help. There were witnesses to this and you can hear on the calls that he was calling for help. In no way can Zimmerman cite self defense. You and I disagree. We can do this. It does not make one right and the other wrong. It means we disagree. Now all we can do is wait for prosecution and see the outcome. But I do appreciate the debate and your thoughts on the case.


60 posted on 03/21/2012 1:13:05 PM PDT by DallasSun (Courage~Fear that has said its prayers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: DallasSun

keep deluding yourself. I can’t help you.


62 posted on 03/21/2012 1:15:46 PM PDT by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: DallasSun

If you say so? Were you at the scene and did you observe all the events? No, you are just repeating what the trouble makers are saying. Mr. Zimmerman, if attacked by a person who has the abilty, opportunity and places his life jeopardy as the right to use deadly force under the “Castle Doctrine.”


75 posted on 03/21/2012 2:13:41 PM PDT by No Surrender No Retreat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson